• Apytele@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    316
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Look at men’s bodies! They have prostates capable of being stimulated to climax. God designed men for the magnificent job of bottoming and what could be more beautiful than a man orgasming while getting railed up the ass?

  • moistclump@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    158
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Reminder that just because you don’t have children, doesn’t mean you have to achieve a certain level of career or academia. You’re still valid. I’m still valid…

    • Visstix@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      44
      ·
      2 months ago

      I’ve done my part to make the world a better place by not having kids, and I’m just cruising along.

        • skulblaka@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          2 months ago

          You guys have expendable income?

          I can’t complain too much, because I usually end each month with a couple hundred in pocket money, but one of the primary reasons I don’t have kids is cause there’s no way in hell I’m going to afford it. The $200ish a month that I waste on weed and video games are not going to afford diapers and daycare.

          • Confused_Emus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            Yeah, it’s not really that much, but it’s precisely for that reason that I know after paying for my own necessities, I can’t afford mini-mes. And let’s not even get started on the emotional baggage I picked up in childhood that keeps me convinced to this day it’s best to just not perpetuate a negative cycle my family seems stuck in.

    • Matriks404@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      2 months ago

      Reminder that you don’t have to do anything at all in life, and these who day otherwise are wrong.

      • doctordevice@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        2 months ago

        In fact I strive to do as little as possible. I only work to pay the bills. If I could luck upon a comfortable enough nest egg I would quit working immediately and just play games the rest of my life (video & board, solo and with friends/family).

        Hell, I may end up contributing more to society that way since I enjoy dabbling in video game design but don’t have enough time to actually work towards anything I could release. If I had time, maybe I’d actually create something for a wider audience rather than whatever minor contribution I have at work.

      • M137@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Well, one thing you should do in life is read the text you’ve written and checking for errors.

    • JokeDeity@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 months ago

      I always like to remind people that their ancestors survived as fishermen and farmers and peasants, you aren’t a failure if you don’t become the president or the greatest person in your field or whatever.

    • pressanykeynow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      I don’t think “valid” is a proper word for someone’s life. You don’t have to be validated by anyone, you don’t own anyone anything. Do what you yourself see fit for this one-time adventure.

    • where_am_i@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      2 months ago

      And if you do want children and are fulfilled living a life dedicated to making and raising them, you’re also still valid.

      In fact, that would be an accomplishment, while simply existing isn’t. But this planet got an overpopulation problem, so if all you wanna do is continue simply and unimportantly existing while also not procreating, I’d say, go ahead.

  • _bcron@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    108
    ·
    2 months ago

    Look at your bodies, women! An internal inguinal canal less likely to cause a hernia, lower center of gravity, higher body fat, and less body hair for easier cleanup. God created you for spending long hours in the coal mines!

    • Shou@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      44
      ·
      2 months ago

      But men’s long ass nosehair makes for natural filters against the dust in the mines! Clearly men are better suited for the mines!

      • Narauko@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        64
        ·
        2 months ago

        But look at how small and dexterous the children are, able to squeeze and clamber through the tunnels. And look at what they play all day: Minecraft. Clearly the children are best suited, as they yearn for the mines.

  • RandomVideos@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    81
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    Look at your bodies, men. Legs and arms. God created you to fight bears with no weapons every day of your life

    • thefartographer@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      92
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      A. Username checks out
      B. I can help you figure out your purpose serving men! But before you can walk, you must crawl. First, you’re going to learn how to hunt men. Then how to cook men. Once you’ve mastered these two, you will spend months or years learning how to plate men. Finally, serving men. Then you’ll be ready to start your own menstaurant.

  • style99@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    69
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    It’s always the Devil who tries to convince everyone that he speaks for God.

    • NielsBohron@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      2 months ago

      I’d remove the religious implications and say “it’s always those who are most convinced they have a monopoly on Truth who are most dehumanizing to the out-group”

      • style99@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        27
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        I like the way I put it. Way easier to put on a bumper sticker.

          • NielsBohron@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            Believe me, I’m all for using religious imagery when it’s appropriate for getting the point across. However, the whole point of OP’s statement is lost if it’s not made clear that religion itself is the primary source of this evil. Otherwise, “It’s always the Devil who tries to convince everyone that he speaks for God,” could just as easily mean “my god is right and yours is the devil.”

        • NielsBohron@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Fair point, but using ambiguous religious language to convey the dangers of religion seems a bit open to misinterpretation, imo.

  • flamingo_pinyata@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    67
    ·
    2 months ago

    FYI If you don’t have any connective tissue between your breasts, ovaries and womb you might have a problem. Your doctor should check you for vitamin deficiency

      • Whelks_chance@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        39
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Female presenting profile pic, we don’t actually know anything about the human who typed it

        • odium@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          44
          ·
          2 months ago

          They call themselves a “transformed wife” and, living in Texas, I’ve met enough of the self proclaimed evangelical trad wife types to know that there are plenty of deeply brainwashed women who hold these beliefs and would agree with this post.

        • half_fiction@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          She’s made videos and written books full of this vile bullshit. So we know she’s all too real, unfortunately. She exists in the Christian Fundamentalist influencer corner of the internet, which is about as fun as it sounds. Google “Transformed Wife.”

        • cheers_queers@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          we do though. she has a YouTube channel. she’s a disgusting vile piece of shit who beat her kids from the time they were babies and tells other parents to do the same. as well as promoting rape culture, rigid gender roles, etc.

      • GojuRyu@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        2 months ago

        If you look her up you will see that this is one of her more tame takes unfortunately. At least this is not about her views on women’s place in marriage or the rights a husband supposedly has to their wives body, regardless of consent. I can’t help but feel a little sad for her though. From her recounting of her life it sounds like she married a man she didn’t love because that’s what she was supposed to do. After over a decade of miserable marriage she broke and saw it as her duty to be servile in all things to a man she was never really attracted to and convinced herself that happiness is to live that submissive life in deference to a man in all things. If it was the story of someone who got out and found a life outside those oppressive beliefs it would be a cautionary tale, but she sees it as the recipe for a good biblical life.

      • where_am_i@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        2 months ago

        No, it makes it zero disgusting. It’s a person making a passionate calling. She simply calls for others to follow their steps, she’s a woman and a mother, and believes everything she says, and is probably happy and fulfilled and is wishing that to others.

        You seem to be triggered af by literally everything and can’t see when someone’s heart is in the right place regardless of whether you agree with them or not.

        Maybe that snowflake term your older generation used was correct. Cuz, frankly, you guys act like a bunch of rebellious teenagers. Kinda cringe.

        Oh, I’m an atheist, feminist, child-free, I don’t have a tweeter, and where I live abortions are legal. And you’re cringe even to me.

  • NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    2 months ago

    It’s always the people who are most obsessed with us reproducing who also work the hardest to make sure there isn’t any future for our children.

    • Shhalahr@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Of course, reproduction without any forethought is one of the things that leads to that lack of future.

  • Iron Lynx@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    2 months ago

    I have hands that can turn into fists. Does that mean I was created for hitting things?

    This is your logic, woman!

    • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      I mean, unironically… from an evolutionary pov, yeah kind of. I don’t know specifics about how hands evolved, but knuckles seem to be shaped a certain way for reasons. I imagine big, boney knuckles was a trait that got successfully passed down due to its usefulness.

      I am not an evolutionary biologist, so I could be wrong. Evolution is weird and counterintuitive sometimes.

      • django@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        Hands are fragile, they were created to hold tools. Like a stone. Stones are for hitting, not your poor fragile hands.

        If you use a stone, you can still play the piano or paint your favorite landscape afterwards.

      • Ultraviolet@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 months ago

        Kicking is our natural unarmed attack. Still a last resort compared to throwing rocks or whacking with sticks though. We evolved from ancestors who already used tools to defend themselves.

      • xthexder@l.sw0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        If you look at how Gorillas kind of walk around on their fists, it definitely makes sense that there’s some evolutionary benefit to the knuckle shape. It doesn’t have to be related to hitting things either. It’s easiest to support yourself with a straight wrist, like if you’re holding a branch, vs putting your palm flat is a lot more stress on your wrist.

      • Dragon Rider (drag)@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        13
        ·
        2 months ago

        Drag has fingers that are just the right size to shove up a huge cloaca. Does this mean drag was created for the purpose of giving handjobs to dragons? Yes, yes it does. And drag is happy with drag’s purpose.

  • Asafum@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    2 months ago

    “God created you…”

    Ughhh… Find comfort in religion, fine, but let’s not go push your idea of creation and the ramifications of such on others tyvm…

    • humble peat digger@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      25
      ·
      2 months ago

      Serious question.

      Are u people advocating for humanity just dying off? Why not have kids? That’s normal::: spoiler spoiler

      • AbsentBird@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        I think they’re advocating that women can choose for themselves what kind of person to be, and the fact their bodies are capable of gestating new humans doesn’t obligate them to do so.

        It’s sort of like how the fact a man’s body may be capable of entertaining others by dressing their penis up in a tiny coat and hat doesn’t mean we should bully an entire gender into making that the purpose of their existence, nor does it mean we’re advocating for a world without sharp dressed dicks.

        Let people live their lives based on who they are, not the abilities of their genitals.

        • humble peat digger@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Noone has to do anything.
          But there seems to be a sustained campaign against having kids.
          Imo This is just fighting against the natural way of life.

          • AbsentBird@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 months ago

            Noone has to do anything.

            The original tweet essentially said that all women have a mission from God to use their bodies to make babies. At the very least it’s a value judgment on how women live their lives.

            There seems to be a sustained campaign against having kids.

            I have never encountered this. There is absolutely a sustained campaign for bodily autonomy, and for the acceptance of people who choose not to reproduce; but I haven’t encountered anyone talking like the original tweet, saying women have a mission from God to not have kids or something.

            This is just fighting against the natural way of life.

            Here we go again with imposing judgements on people who don’t reproduce. I feel like that’s the bigger ‘sustained campaign’ in this conversation. The natural way of life changes over time, it used to be natural to die young from a bacterial infection, or to have your village sacked by marauders. We don’t need to have the same pressures to keep reproduction high as in the past. Populations are still increasing, but people are out here blaming women for not doing it faster? Just take a breath, it’s going to be okay.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 months ago

        Just FYI, my wife has two masters degrees and still was able to get pregnant, give birth and help raise a child with me afterward. So apparently it is possible for women to have advanced university degrees and have kids.

        Incidentally, my mother also has two masters degrees, so apparently that was also possible in the 1970s without the population crashing.

        • humble peat digger@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Nobody says it’s impossible.
          And my wife has a college degree and has no impetus to work at all.

          Her sister has masters and doesn’t want to work either .
          Riddle me that

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            2 months ago

            You seem to think suggesting women get advanced degrees means we also think people shouldn’t have babies.

            Also, you seem to be making some stupid “women don’t want to work” claim which is just nonsense.

            • humble peat digger@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              2 months ago

              The only question I have - why advocate childlessness? U people seem to be making claims that if woman has kids - she’s automatically a baby factory and a servant.
              This is mindbiggling

              • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                2 months ago

                Nope. The claim is that the tradwife is the one who thinks that.

                Everyone else is saying she’s wrong.

                And your stupid “women don’t want to work” implication is still stupid.

                • humble peat digger@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  Are u denying that not all women at all want to do the day job and then take care of the kids? I’m telling u not every one at all want to do that