https://rosettacode.org/

And I think they rewrote a bunch of C libraries in order to have a better cross-platform compiler for C and zig. Or something along those lines

You can’t replace it.

Zig?

Terminal velocity is the maximum speed attainable by an object as it falls through a fluid (air is the most common example). It is reached when the sum of the drag force (Fd) and the buoyancy is equal to the downward force of gravity (FG) acting on the object. Since the net force on the object is zero, the object has zero acceleration

Objects in a vacuum have no drag and no terminal velocity…

How would it reach terminal velocity in a vacuum?

https://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.en.html

GPL is hard or tough to monetize

What do you mean?

stuff will get even spicier when we have conservations whether code is asset itself (especially scripts).

That’s true. What about LGPL?

e.g. don’t touch AGPL code unless you also use AGPL

Just to clear this up: copyleft licenses, GPL variants for example, require the license of your code to equally preserve the freedoms provided to your users, or in other words also be a copyleft license. There are some loopholes like GPL on a server, but be very careful when using copyleft code unless you want to use a copyleft license as well.

It gets somewhat murkier when you use someone’s code and base yours on that. IANAL, and that’s very much the legal territory. If at all possible, just reuse the original copyright and license and then derive your work (given the license allows that).

That all depends on the license AFAIK, but IANAL. Most FOSS licenses allow you to do whatever you want while preserving copyright claims, and that includes rewriting or changing the license. GPL forces copyleft, so even if you rewrote it from scratch, you could still be liable if you saw the original code.

For example I’ve heard that corpos bootleg copyleft code by having completely separate teams doing design and implementation. The implementation team can’t ever see any part of the original code, and they have limited communication with the design team. I think that would also go around the copyright claims as well.

If at all possible, just reuse the original copyright and license and then derive your work (given the license allows that).

Or just slap a GPL and subsume everything within a vortex of FREEDOM, and thusly become a true FOSS dude

there are very few “starter” Clojure jobs; they mostly expect you to have years of experience.

That’s because the language is made for people who wrote java for the last 10 years. It’s cool and all, but it’s horrible for learning programming when you compare it to cl or scheme. Neither of them break language uniformity and simplicity in order to accommodate java interop, while also having decades worth of excellent teaching material.

It’s a Lisp language which is the oldest kind.

Fortran, COBOL, ALGOL are older

Instead of “object oriented”, I think if it as verb oriented. Each statement is a verb (function) possibly followed by all the nouns you want to apply it to. Easy peasy, right?

I think you’re over complicating the explanation, it’s just a different notation:

(1 + 2 + 3) == (+ 1 2 3)

(1 + (2 * 3)) == (+ 1 (* 2 3))

People complain that there’s “too many parentheses”. People like to complain about dumb stuff.

I think it’s got more to do with everything seemingly being completely different. Most languages have C-style syntax, and python is like the only popular exception. It’s like knowing only latin and having to learn cyrilic or alphabet.

It’s not pretty, but it’s uniform, obvious, and easy to understand.

go is good grug friend who chase away complexity demon by limit damage of big brain developer

Julia, Clojure and Go. Are any of these good for a beginner or should I start with something else?

That totally depends on what you want to do.

Go should be easiest since it’s purposefully simplified in order to make learning it easier. There are some more difficult concepts, but the start should be easy enough. I know about go with tests, but it’s not really programming beginner friendly.

I’d avoid clojure as a beginner. It’s more for people who know java, but don’t want to write java. Common lisp and schemes are good for learning programming, but they’re not a popular group of languages and that can be a problem.

Thou shalt write two k’s, no more, no less. Two shall be the number of k’s thou will write, and the number of k’s of the writing will be two. Four shalt thou not write, neither write thou one, excepting that thou then proceed to two. Three is right out. Once the number is two, being the second k is written, then lobbest thou thy message towards thy foe.

More like genocidal sociopaths. Can you guess what two species are the main cause of multiple extinctions?

https://www.theextinctions.com/articles-1/the-flightless-wren-and-the-lighthousekeepers-cat

Usually extremely fast and venomous

deleting files wouldn’t violate GPL-3.0

Unless you delete the license itself

That’s great! The keyboard is meant to be stationary, indeed.

Try it with your current one first. I’ve only installed it through nix and guix, so it might be a possible issue for you if it’s not easily available.

I’d love to, but where? Are there stores that stock them?

No clue. If you can’t find that keyboard in the area, look for keyboards using the same switches. It’s not the only factor, but probably the most relevant.

You can use kmonad to configure keys, layers, layouts, etc. on any keyboard. AFAIK unless you’re going to use the keyboard on random computers, it can replicate all of the functionality you’d want.

For sound:

• find a physical model to try out
• order one of those switch samplers
• find info from reviewers

Additional food for thought: get a keyboard with hot-swappable switches to possibly replace them with quieter ones. Also there are tricks to make it quieter like adding o-rings and a shock absorber for the bottom plate.

You when you mess something up and only figure it out later?