Game #146 Shortest path: 5 (Avg. 5) Total words: 7 (Avg. 7) 🟦🟦🟪🟥🟥 | 🔥 1

https://linxicon.com #Linxicon

I’m not blaming him at all. Him being an Entomologist makes this all worse. She didn’t even question where the name came from.

More precisely, how has the relationship come this far without him knowing she hates all bugs?

I’ve come to terms with the fact we will never be able to understand and manipulate physics to the point of interstellar travel.

This would just incentivize malicious compliance. “here’s a list of books we own. To purchase, send a letter to this address with a cheque and wait 30 to 60 days”.

#travle #569 +0 (Perfect) ✅✅✅ https://travle.earth

One thing I misunderstood is that it’s not about how close they are semantically, but in meaning. It’s subtle.

This must be the most frustrating game like these. I don’t get the intuition of why some words are decided distance. I guess it takes into account all possible meanings.

Edit: in the end I was able to get the perfect score after several tries.

I just don’t really understand the point of the question. I care about “the planet” because I feel empathy for my fellow humans and would like to leave a healthy environment for the future generations to come. I won’t leave any offspring. So when I die, my linage ends. After I die I will stop experiencing anything. And yet I still care. But I only care because my brain is wired to feel empathy.

I don’t care at all that the universe might have no one to experience it when our sun blows up. As statistically unlikely as that might be.

That’s very lovely, but ultimately egotistical. I mean, I romanticise about it too, but the universe ultimately just… is. The only severity is for us humans. No other species has a sense of “species” as a community AFAIK. Heck, even humans have a terrible track record. We can’t even seem to sterilise machines we sent to space no matter how hard we try, even after being exposed to outer space. That’s the evidence we have.

Life is way hardier than you think… Unless we completely blast the world with nukes, we will not get that far.

Even life will never perish. We’re certainly going to cause an apocalyptic level extinction event, taking many species with us, but life will always find a way.

I prefer that than to sneak defects in huge PRs.

I know this is a joke, but it you did that I would reject the pr with the reason of too many things at once. Reopen separate PR to refactor variable names. I actually constaly get people doing this and it’s dangerous exactly for the reason you’re joking about. Makes it easier for errors to slip in.

Wordle 1,109 3/6

⬛⬛🟨🟨⬛
🟨🟩⬛🟨🟨
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩

Nice

Spraying the whole kingdom.

Caterpillar: Can’t wait to become a beautiful butterfly. Oh hello Mr. wasp ☺️

I just read in a podcast that studying the effects of Helium in our throats helped us understand better the acoustics of our throats, and from there we also gained some understanding into how other animals, including dinossaurs, sound like.

But that applies to life as we know it today right? The first life forms couldn’t have taken over the earth instantly, they weren’t battle hardened bacteria, but very simples beings, not far from overly complex proteins. Probably took at least some million years for a microbe to spread around the earth, just from the sheer size of it. So in that time, life could originate from other similar primordial soups.

Why does it seem unlikely life appeared more than once? My understanding was that when life started, the conditions were optimal for complex molecules to form (warm water, lots of organic compounds) so around that time (give or take half a billion year) it may have happened, but in very similar ways.