✨✨Go to https://www.squarespace.com/alicecappelle to save 10% off your first purchase of a website or domain and use the code ALICECAPPELLE !✨You can support...

While watching the video I couldn’t stop thinking about the fediverse. It’s basically self-organized social-media. While it is far from perfect it is so much better than the corporate alternative in terms of relevant content. I’m just sad that basically nobody I know personally actually uses the fediverse…

https://piped.video/watch?v=AuZgTAW1QvA

  • Nougat@fedia.io
    291·
    3 months ago

    I’m just sad that basically nobody I know personally actually uses the fediverse

    oooOOOooooo look at this one, they know people personally.

    • Deceptichum@quokk.auEnglish
      1·
      3 months ago

      Eh I knew one person who used Reddit before.

      These sites just aren’t the same as social media like fb, insta, etc. in terms of mass appeal.

    • boredsquirrel@slrpnk.net
      11·
      3 months ago

      Yeah but same here, I know many people on the fediverse, but from the like 0,0001% of people that use it.

      And having no algorithm sucks completely.

      Platforms like Mastodon make nearly no sense without one, as everyone is just throwing garbage into the void.

      • Alk@lemmy.worldEnglish
        1·
        3 months ago

        I prefer having no algorithm. I find what and who I want, and I organize it myself. It feels like the old internet.

        • Nougat@fedia.io
          1·
          3 months ago

          And you might even - wait for it - come across things that you weren’t expecting to, or don’t fully agree with. Being exposed to ideas like that is much healthier than being fed what an algorithm decides will elicit engagement from you.

  • The Snark Urge@lemmy.worldEnglish
    15·
    3 months ago

    I might be in favor of banning for-profit social media, or at least regulating it more firmly and protecting consumers, and keeping people like Zuckerberg from using it to influence elections… Somehow. If that’s not practical, I’ll revert to supporting a ban.

    • thisfro@slrpnk.netOP
      6·
      3 months ago

      Yeah that is also I thought I have, but usually more with encryption. If the government (or any other entity really) wants to mandate a backdoor to private messages, I’ll just host my own service for that. They can’t control every private person (at least as long encryption isn’t broken). The same idea would could be applied to social-media. Even if there’s a total ban, they won’t be able to prosecute anyone hosting their own little server.

      • The Snark Urge@lemmy.worldEnglish
        5·
        3 months ago

        It’s a moot point. There’s no political appetite for such a ban, and those vested interests are fully entrenched in our way of life. They have to be done away with by other means, if at all

  • ComradeSharkfucker@lemmy.mlEnglish
    8·
    3 months ago

    I am in favor of banning the profit based mode of production. This includes social media in its current popular forms

  • Jilanico@lemmy.worldEnglish
    8·
    3 months ago

    I feel like an algorithm that sucks you in is what makes a social media platform popular. But an algorithm is part of what makes social media so toxic.

    I love that the fediverse doesn’t have ulterior motives, but that might be why it never becomes mainstream. I’d choose smaller crowd over toxic tho.

  • Lime Buzz@beehaw.org
    6·
    3 months ago

    Whilst I don’t think we could ban it if we wanted to, I do think that a focus less on either commercialising social media or commercial social media in general with their algorithms etc would be better for people’s mental health.

    That is not to say that non commercial social is better inherently, it is all about the attitude people come to it with, getting away from the virality, fame and poorly thought out opinions and misinformation, working on bigotries and self esteem and developing community and genuine friendship with a diverse array of people would create a better social media and world in general.

    Sadly not even the fediverse is at all close to that yet, perhaps it will be one day, but there are still so many folks with ideas around what social media should be for that they haven’t dropped their ideas that make it untenable and unbearable, they also haven’t let go of a lot of their bigotries and don’t listen when told otherwise, that and even with the best of intentions it can still create low self-esteem with edited media or people only showing you their ‘best’ sides, even without algorithms.

    Social media should be about improving the world and ourselves, but it has a long way to go to create that mindset and to reward it, even the fediverse.

    • thisfro@slrpnk.netOP
      2·
      3 months ago

      Very well put! I think parts of the fediverse are pretty close already, because they really focus on community. slrpnk, beehaw or mander come to mind. But the larger the instances are, the less they are an actual community and more of a random collection of people.

  • lone_faerie@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish
    6·
    3 months ago

    If you want to get people to join the fediverse, I think the best way is to point out where it shines, not necessarily in relation to other social media. I’ve gotten a couple of friends to sign up for Lemmy because of how trans-friendly it is, especially on Blåhaj Zone. It’s such a breath of fresh air from the rampant transphobia on mainstream social media platforms.

    • thisfro@slrpnk.netOP
      8·
      3 months ago

      The people that I know who would be interested in the concept are also the people who don’t have any social-media at all…

      • metaStatic@kbin.earth
        4·
        3 months ago

        right? Reddit was my only social media for over a decade, and I still refuse to call it that because it wasn’t directly connected to my real identity.

  • GenderNeutralBro@lemmy.sdf.orgEnglish
    4·
    3 months ago

    I think it’s important to distinguish between social media in general and specific platforms like Facebook, Twitter, etc. Don’t say things like “social media is designed to <blank>” when you really mean “Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, and Reddit are designed to <blank>”.

    The first step to fixing a problem is to identify it clearly and accurately.

    The problems with social media in practice have little to do with the general concept of social media. There are ways we could regulate our way to a better internet, by heavily disincentivizing dark patterns, and still have thriving social media platforms.

    IMHO, there are a couple things to focus on:

    1. Restrict or outright ban data collection, sale, and sharing. Targeted advertising is not necessary for a healthy internet. It’s gotten completely out of control. Fuck you and your 872 closest partners.

    2. Mandate transparency in algorithms. Facebook, Google, Twitter, etc. have all manipulated their users by gaming their algorithms to maximize engagement, promote political ideas, or even outright conduct psychological experiments on unwitting users. There’s no need for a sorting algorithm to be opaque to the user. It’s feasible for it to be user-customizable to one degree or another.

    • thisfro@slrpnk.netOP
      3·
      3 months ago

      Very true and I think the 2 points could already come a long way. They could also be applied to the fediverse or similar networks without issue.

  • ex_06@slrpnk.netMEnglish
    4·
    3 months ago

    “if i have a message to share, i go where people are.”

    really good reminder for all the people who want to push fedi to strangers on the internet :)

    work with communities and content creators!

  • BurritoBoi@pawb.social
    3·
    3 months ago

    I think the brand of social media that is designed solely for as much engagement as possible should be gone forever. Forum based social sites where moderation can be more tailored to the groups involved and community owned social media needs to come back. People act as if they can’t live without the social media we have today but that is just bullshit… we literally did fine with that a decade ago.

  • thisfro@slrpnk.netOP
    3·
    3 months ago

    I tried commenting on Youtube to bring up the idea of the fediverse. However, my comments are not shown. Does anyone know how Youtube blocks comments?

    • lone_faerie@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish
      2·
      3 months ago

      I see your comment. I think Youtube hides them until they pass moderation. The creator could also have comments require their approval before being made public.

      • thisfro@slrpnk.netOP
        1·
        3 months ago

        Yeah I see it now too, but this was like the 3rd attempt that got published

        Also it’s a way shittier version of what I tried to post but it was all gone and didn’t want to write everything again…

    • _sideffect@lemmy.world
      2·
      3 months ago

      I went through this recently.

      They monitor you if you’ve been to certain videos and check your comment history. If they feel you’re commenting too much towards a side (I’m guessing right wing), they delete your posts right away.

      It could also be the video creator themselves, or the mods they hire to filter comments.

      Key words also trigger their system and put you on their watch list.

      • thisfro@slrpnk.netOP
        2·
        3 months ago

        I basically never comment on Youtube, so not sure about the first ones.

        Key words also trigger their system and put you on their watch list.

        But probably this… Maybe “federated” or “non-profit” is too spicy for Youtube haha

  • YourPrivatHater@ani.social
    2·
    3 months ago

    We should ban social media that is heavily profit driven, some ads ok, but the algorithm to keep you there at all costs with the most polarizing posts and videos is just shit.

    • yum@lemmy.eco.br
      1·
      3 months ago

      She does mention the reason of her usage of this captalist platform, around the end of the video.