• bionicjoey@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    They made Services into a local good (ie. It can only be bought and sold locally in a single state, the market access for it is effectively 0). This means that urban centres tend to hold more population since they are constantly in demand.

    They also made it so that Urban centres provide a small amount of Infrastructure, meaning that urbanization will help offset the infrastructure demand of factories and the like.

    • nootstorm@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s neat. Have they done the same for transportation? Always seemed bizarre that railways could provide transportation to railway-less states.

      • bionicjoey@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yes, they’ve done the same with transportation as well as electricity. It is definitely more realistic, but it requires a bit more micro since you can only switch buildings over to using those local goods once their production exists in that state.

        • nootstorm@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Fab, thanks. Aye, does sound more micro heavy, but at least the entire population of China will no longer try to use my Lanfang’s railways and scupper industrialisation.

          • bionicjoey@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            You mean you don’t immediately open Lanfang up to immigration, thus ruining everyone’s standard of living for cheap labour‽ How utterly uncapitalist!