fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 2 years agoMad Scientistsmander.xyzimagemessage-square46linkfedilinkarrow-up1988arrow-down110
arrow-up1978arrow-down1imageMad Scientistsmander.xyzfossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 2 years agomessage-square46linkfedilink
minus-squareMBM@lemmings.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up31arrow-down1·2 years agoNo love for the mad theorists huh? The mad philosophers, linguists, mathematicians, …
minus-squareMareOfNights@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up37·2 years agoThey are already mad. Have you met mathematicians?
minus-squareshneancy@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up15arrow-down1·2 years agoI would also go mad if I had to accept that 83 is a prime number but 1 isn’t
minus-squareThisIsAManWhoKnowsHowToGling@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·edit-221 days agodeleted by creator
minus-squareshneancy@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·2 years agowhat i’m mad about is that you can divide by infinity and get zero, but you can’t divide by 0 and get infinity. make up your minds maths people
minus-squarealsimoneau@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·2 years agoOh you totally can (as long as you’re working with implied limits, which you have to if infinity is in the mix), you just have to specify if it’s a positive or negative zero.
minus-squareshneancy@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·2 years agopositive or negative nothing 💀 right
minus-squareSwedneck@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·2 years agoi mean, implicitly it’s just whether you’re approaching zero from positive or negative direction, since we’re working with limits. Like you can shave down a stick however much you want, you can never reach 0 stick by doing so.
minus-squareThisIsAManWhoKnowsHowToGling@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·edit-221 days agodeleted by creator
minus-squarec0ber@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·2 years agoif you want mad linguistics you may enjoy agma schwa’s cursed conlang circus
minus-squareRozaŭtuno@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 years agoMad linguists are just prescriptivists.
minus-squaregandalf_der_12te@feddit.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 years agowell, not only. There’s also those that try to reconstruct the original language.
No love for the mad theorists huh? The mad philosophers, linguists, mathematicians, …
They are already mad. Have you met mathematicians?
I would also go mad if I had to accept that 83 is a prime number but 1 isn’t
deleted by creator
what i’m mad about is that you can divide by infinity and get zero, but you can’t divide by 0 and get infinity. make up your minds maths people
Oh you totally can (as long as you’re working with implied limits, which you have to if infinity is in the mix), you just have to specify if it’s a positive or negative zero.
positive or negative nothing 💀 right
i mean, implicitly it’s just whether you’re approaching zero from positive or negative direction, since we’re working with limits.
Like you can shave down a stick however much you want, you can never reach 0 stick by doing so.
deleted by creator
if you want mad linguistics you may enjoy agma schwa’s cursed conlang circus
Mad linguists are just prescriptivists.
well, not only. There’s also those that try to reconstruct the original language.