Orbiting Observer
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • Create Community
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
teft@lemmy.world to Spaceflight@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · 1 year ago

NASA decides to keep 2 astronauts in space until February, nixes return on troubled Boeing capsule

apnews.com

external-link
message-square
61
link
fedilink
  • cross-posted to:
  • space@lemmy.world
195
external-link

NASA decides to keep 2 astronauts in space until February, nixes return on troubled Boeing capsule

apnews.com

teft@lemmy.world to Spaceflight@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · 1 year ago
message-square
61
link
fedilink
  • cross-posted to:
  • space@lemmy.world
NASA has decided it’s too risky to bring two astronauts back to Earth in Boeing’s troubled new capsule. They’ll have to wait until February for a ride home with SpaceX.
  • Diplomjodler@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 year ago

    No way Starliner flies again. This whole thing has been a gigantic fiasco from day one. I hope they pull the plug and spend the money on programs with a future.

    • Jumuta@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      boeing’s spending the money not nasa, it’s a fixed price contract

      • trolololol@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        When has that ever happened?

        • Jumuta@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          only for starliner as far as i know, every other boeing thing is cost plus

          • trolololol@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            finally NASA making decent financial decisions

            • Jumuta@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              they really dodged the bullet with this one

              • trolololol@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Yep, it only took 50 years of lessons with the same contractors to learn it am I right?

          • Bangs42@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Starliner and Crew Dragon both, if we’re talking manned space capsules.

            • Jumuta@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              crew dragon isn’t Boeing is it

              • threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.worksM
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                No, but it is fixed-price, which I think is what @Bangs42@lemmy.world was getting at.

    • CaptDust@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      I disagree, they have so much time and money investment into starliner, it has to fly again. They can’t throw out 15 years of development.

      • SpacePirate@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Sunk cost fallacy. Fuck Boeing, why should the government keep funding this?

        • CaptDust@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s not a usual cost-plus contract, to my knowledge, the government hasn’t funded it beyond the initial half billion. Boeing is taking a bath on this capsule development, needs the crew contracts to recoup, and that’s why I don’t believe they will abandon it.

          • intensely_human@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            This whole thing makes me feel so sad.

            • threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.worksM
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              I don’t know. Part of me feels a bit of glee that Boeing is having to foot the bill for their own incompetence.

      • ramchak@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        1 year ago

        They definitely should throw away 15 years worth of development if they are unable to deliver. Any more money spent would be wasted

      • superkret@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        15 years of development, and they didn’t manage to build rubber seals that seal.

      • burble@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        They’re more than $1.5 billion in hole on this contract, but they must be doing some math on how many future contracts they might miss out on if they back out.

      • BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Don’t throw good money after bad (or the sunk-cost fallacy).

        Though it’s not like all that development is lost. They retain all they’ve learned and developed. Just costs a bit to store the data.

Spaceflight@sh.itjust.works

spaceflight@sh.itjust.works

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !spaceflight@sh.itjust.works

Your one-stop shop for spaceflight news and discussion.

All serious posts related to spaceflight are welcome! JAXA, ISRO, CNSA, Roscosmos, ULA, RocketLab, Firefly, Relativity, Blue Origin, etc. (Arca and Pythom, if you must).

Other related space communities:

  • !rocketlab@lemmy.nz
  • !curiosityrover@lemmy.world
  • !perseverancerover@lemmy.world
  • !esa@feddit.nl
  • !nasa@lemmy.world
  • !spacex@sh.itjust.works
  • !astronomy@mander.xyz
  • !militaryspace@sh.itjust.works
  • !space@mander.xyz

Related meme community:

  • !spaceflightmemes@sh.itjust.works
Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 17 users / day
  • 70 users / week
  • 230 users / month
  • 933 users / 6 months
  • 1 local subscriber
  • 2.31K subscribers
  • 2.17K Posts
  • 3.52K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.works
  • llamacoffee@lemmy.world
  • BE: 0.19.13
  • Modlog
  • Legal
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org