• CaptDust@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    2 months ago

    I disagree, they have so much time and money investment into starliner, it has to fly again. They can’t throw out 15 years of development.

    • SpacePirate@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Sunk cost fallacy. Fuck Boeing, why should the government keep funding this?

      • CaptDust@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        It’s not a usual cost-plus contract, to my knowledge, the government hasn’t funded it beyond the initial half billion. Boeing is taking a bath on this capsule development, needs the crew contracts to recoup, and that’s why I don’t believe they will abandon it.

    • ramchak@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      2 months ago

      They definitely should throw away 15 years worth of development if they are unable to deliver. Any more money spent would be wasted

    • burble@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 months ago

      They’re more than $1.5 billion in hole on this contract, but they must be doing some math on how many future contracts they might miss out on if they back out.

    • BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      Don’t throw good money after bad (or the sunk-cost fallacy).

      Though it’s not like all that development is lost. They retain all they’ve learned and developed. Just costs a bit to store the data.