• AFK BRB Chocolate@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    What you’re saying is for sure true, but even if the wavelengths were a complete match we can’t know if they’re represented to the animals the same way they are to us. It could be something wildly different. If you think of trying to explain what colors are to someone who was blind from birth, it could be that same level of difference between us an animals - something impossible to envision.

    • AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      That’s kind of the philosophical issue of qualia: we don’t know if I experience red the same way you do, even if our eyes are physiologically identical. The most we can say is that my red maps onto yours in a way that preserves distinctions of meaning, and I think that’s all they’re trying to do with these cameras.

      • AFK BRB Chocolate@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        I agree that’s what they’re trying to do, but the headline is a bit misleading. Even the people making the system aren’t saying this is what it looks like to the animals.