• ourob@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    I would love to see the cost/feasibility of boosting to a stable/graveyard orbit. The ISS is massive and not built for that kind of maneuver, but it would be great to be able to preserve it for the future.

    • BluJay320@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Does seem like a massive waste to just get rid of it. Feel like it could be repurposed for other use

      Granted, its international status probably makes any decisions about utilizing it for something else difficult

      • smoothbrain coldtakes@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s too old to be retrofitted and it wasn’t designed to last forever.

        The computer systems on board controlling all the essential systems, I’d have to assume given the age of the station and when everything was designed, they’d have used 32 bit computing tech because that was what was prevalent when the station launched.

        A lot of people say “boost it into graveyard orbit” but another problem is that physically it was not designed to last forever, and just over general wear and tear, it will begin to disintegrate and rain fragments, so it is much safer to deorbit and decomm.

        • BluJay320@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Fair point, safety should be the primary concern.

          Just unfortunate that it can’t be preserved as a space-tourism destination or something of the sort. Would be neat if it was made into a museum something

          • smoothbrain coldtakes@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            I would also make it a museum too, but I think it’d be more feasible to bring some modules down to Earth and make them tourist attractions.

  • Yamainwitch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    I say give it to them, billionaires today have no class, just take it and give it to our fellow nerds. Problem solved! Elon was going gamble it away anyway.

  • Cyborganism@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    Wouldn’t it be awesome if a bunch of rastas started squatting the station while listening to AI generated dub music, like in Neuromancer?

  • kalkulat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Pay a billion to burn it up?

    It’d cost a lot less to put it in a higher orbit for a thousand years where it could be a museum for space travellers.

    • smoothbrain coldtakes@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      You can’t do that because it will physically fall apart. That’s the main issue with boosting it up higher and just leaving it there. It was never designed to be existing for a thousand years, and eventually wear and tear will make the station naturally break apart. It’s significantly more dangerous for small fragments to drop over time as compared to a deorbit and decomm. At least the deorbit is planned, while the disintegration would be pretty random and not fun to deal with.

      • kalkulat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        You can’t do that because it will physically fall apart.

        Don’t know where you ever got that idea. It raises and lowers itself all of the time these days to avoid debris.

        It could easily be raised to 2-5000 miles by adding energy from a similar small engine (with a decent-sized fuel tank) over a few months/years.

        ‘Wear and tear’ from what? Micrometeorites? The orbits of any ‘small fragments’ (of what?) would decay very slowly and instantly burn-up many centuries later.