I have no idea what I would do with this but I want one so bad.

  • j4k3@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    That is large enough volume for serious automotive interior parts, like that could make entire center consoles, trim, or inserts, pretty much anything exterior except the bumper covers. I think it really needs to run 2.85mm or 3mm filament and a 1mm+ nozzle by default. Heating that bed will require massive power too.

    • Wogi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      3D printing at that scale is just too damn slow and prone to failure for serious manufacturing. It’s one thing for prototyping, but it’s not really viable for at scale manufacturing.

      There’s a significant cost to making the stamping and casting molds that produce these parts but once they’re made, they can produce dozens of units per hour with minimal waste.

      Printing a single bumper would take days. And there would be so much waste on support structures, I would guess must of the material cost is waste.

    • IMALlama@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      I work at an automotive OEM. We’ve used large scale 3D printed prototypes for longer than I’ve worked here (~15 years). Most of our prototype parts are SLS nylon. SLS has the benefit of having free/built in supports.

      Automotive parts are deceivingly large. Yeah, you could print a lot of parts with this volume but most exterior parts, and a lot of interior parts, would need to get split. For example, the first gen miata, which is a pretty tiny car, has a hood that’s 36" x 41" and 45" long doors.

      This isn’t to say that there’s no space for 3D printing in automotive. It could be a good match for lower volume parts or parts that are designed to be 3D printed (most traditional parts aren’t). Another good use case might be spare parts: https://newsroom.porsche.com/en/company/porsche-classic-3d-printer-spare-parts-sls-printer-production-cars-innovative-14816.html

  • EmilieEvans@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Don’t buy it (right now). Wait for reviews.

    When you see it in person, you realize it’s not finished. It would be fine for an early prototype, but Elegoo thinks they’re past that point, which means they’ll probably ship an unfinished product.

  • Piecemakers@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Elegoo, hunh? So, you’re into random parts failing and then waiting 6+ weeks for replacements from coastal China? Elegoo barely made a viable resin printer with a similar “bigger = better” inspiration, and people are really that excited to throw their money at the same whore in a different dress? 🤦🏼‍♂️

      • Piecemakers@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        They’re not bad machines, per se, but the company’s been pushing the shitty practices envelope in an apparent rush to compete with a shrinking barrier to entry and attempting to create a sub-market for “elite” hobbyist machines (in size only) without increasing the quality of parts but certainly upcharging on them… I currently have 8 Elegoo printers (2 Mini 4Ks, 4 Saturn 8Ks, and 2 Jupiters) as both Phrozen and Anycubic are notably worse in a number of ways. To wit, replacing the Jupiter screens is $250 apiece, whereas the Saturn screens run less than $50 and are not ⅕ the size or value. It’s genuinely disappointing, and I have less than zero confidence that this FDM machine won’t shit the bed right out of the gates.

        All this aside, I recommend you look at established brands in the FDM space that are less likely to be making a cash grab outside their comfort zone.

        • thorbot@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Hm, I have had an entirely different experience. Phrozen has been by far the best and most reliable printer I have ever owned, and I’ve had 6 different brands of FDM and resin over the years… the Phrozen resin printer is still going after 2 years of printing almost daily and I never have to mess with it, it just prints perfectly every time, assuming I don’t cock up the supports.