Yeah, but 99% of the people who supported that endeavour were ugly cavemen.
A minority of wise men is enough.
Yeah, but 99% of the people who supported that endeavour were ugly cavemen.
A minority of wise men is enough.
This is a common misconception? What education system is failing people this badly?
I saw the title and thought this was another politics thread
They’re famously good at DIY, especially plumbing.
Didn’t your dad teach you to turn off the enigmatic astronomical object when you were done with it? You think the universe is justmade of hydrogen or something?
Nothing in this suggests to me that he’s okay with Facebook
Hey, that is how I draw a dog. What are you saying?
How many coconuts sacrificed their lives to achieve colonising the new lands?
Its a level of reproductive attrition rivalling a teenage boy’s bedroom sock
How’s that working out for you? Been getting good politicians?
Quiet, last thing we want to do is draw attention to ourselves. If they leave us alone we can get on with things
Is Nadeau the opposite of Cousteau?
I get called that all the time in the app on my phone
Ironic, I’ve seen a Satanist being the guardian / guide to a furry in a full Suit at a con.
The furry wasn’t the Satanist though.
Church of Satan ones or Satanic Temple ones?
Very different answers there.
Even more variety when you get to the Luciferians.
Rational thought?
Evidence based beliefs?
Cool species.
Their main competition is called a “Neinteindo”
It is in the right groups. Sort of thing you can find talked about at flat earther meetings all over the globe, UFO enthusiasts if you can get a word in to ask and in Christian science journals.
Silly meme. Nuclear bombs are much too heavy to wield on the battlefield, and their shape is unsuitable for piercing platemail armour
Speaking as someone whose professional life depends on an understanding of human thoughts, feelings and sensations, I can’t help but have an opinion on this.
To offer an illustrative example
When I’m writing feedback for my students, which is a repetitive task with individual elements, it’s original and different every time.
And yet, anyone reading it would soon learn to recognise my style same as they could learn to recognise someone else’s or how many people have learned to spot text written by AI already.
I think it’s fair to say that this is because we do have a similar system for creating text especially in response to a given prompt, just like these things called AI. This is why people who read a lot develop their writing skills and style.
But, really significant, that’s not all I have. There’s so much more than that going on in a person.
So you’re both right in a way I’d say. This is how humans develop their individual style of expression, through data collection and stochastic methods, happening outside of awareness. As you suggest, just because humans can do this doesn’t mean the two structures are the same.