Britain cannot into space

I have legitimately never met a single person in real life who has anything positive to say about bazel, and I assume it it because they have all killed themselves.

This thread is wild, I’m here like “cmake is by far the simplest way to cross compile to ARM and x86, with and without Cuda build targets” and y’all are talking about IDEs for some reason.

Manual makefiles don’t scale though and you end up needing some other bootstrap framework pretty quick.

UNDEFINED SYMBOL AAHDYVBBDJFUE804746BBBB

The important part is that you found a way to be smug about a dangerous situation

Yes of course there are syndicalist models as well but these things are still fundamentally different approaches to harm reduction. Capitalism is a boogie man bad word for a number of different economic forces which are inevitable in the face of scarcity. Don’t get caught up in linguistic pigeonholes. The point is that we seek to meditate and mitigate these forces, not that we worship some particular dogma which pretends they can be eliminated.

Yes, that’s exactly what I am saying, but this is what MLs tend to believe.

Have you actually been to rural China by any chance?

It’s almost like that’s one way of measuring economic output and not the only way.

GDP is meant to drive down variance by being a relatively simple thing to measure, and therefore provide a consistent means of tracking long term trends.

The assumption of capitalist-like structures is for a good reason. Because there is literally zero practical evidence that scarcity can exist without them in scalable economies. If you require scalability in the presence of scarcity, you will have markets, you will have currency, you will have competition, you will have investment, and so forth. At best these things can be mediated by centrally planned state capitalism. But pretending like this is not just another brand of harm reduction capitalism is rhetorically counterproductive.

The overwhelming consensus of the past century regarding Marxist economic theory is that it is incomplete at best because it takes a very naive view of scarcity. Where Marx requires revolution and then a bunch of hand waving, modern revisionism requires harm reduction and the gradual whittling down of scarcity over time. Historical materialism is certainly a pretty useful economic lens, but Marx really goes off the rails in the prescriptive conclusions he draws from that analytical framework.

It’s shocking that people don’t see these users as the very obvious trolls they are. People like LoC (and several other usual suspects) literally contribute nothing to any community besides agitation. If you really need a “line” that’s where it is. This “radical tolerance” for obvious propaganda and information warfare is honestly disgusting, and compromise safe spaces far more than it preserves them.

Right, there is no lazy replacement for good opsec. If you are facing a state actor then you need to assume your device storage can be accessed.

Why didn’t you post a screenshot of the final state?

Oh well in that case it’s completely ok!

How’s that boot taste?

Perhaps there are some false claims, but this isn’t one of them. This is their proxy for making being openly gay illegal again because they consider any queer representation to be pornographic.

The reality is just that some kind of python code will have the same race conditions as most other languages moving forward and that’s ok.

Bayesian purist cope and seeth.

Most machine learning is closer to universal function approximation via autodifferentiation. Backpropagation just lets you create numerical models with insane parameter dimensionality.

Oi mate! Wankin loicense! Give it here. Noi!

Pixel dungeon, but it’s not really low stress.