MataVatnik@lemmy.world to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 1 day agoAnon questions our energy sectorslrpnk.netimagemessage-square342fedilinkarrow-up11.07Karrow-down1168
arrow-up1899arrow-down1imageAnon questions our energy sectorslrpnk.netMataVatnik@lemmy.world to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 1 day agomessage-square342fedilink
minus-squareRememberTheApollo_@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up15arrow-down3·6 hours agoTBF a nuclear incident is not like burning just one house down. It’s burning down the whole city and making it unusable for a decade or ten.
minus-squarejaschen@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·3 hours agoWhile 100% true for nuclear, the current state of burning fossil fuels is much MUCH worse.
minus-squareRememberTheApollo_@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·3 hours agoYes. Over the long term it will render the planet uninhabitable, or at least close enough to it.
minus-squareOsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·5 hours agoI think a town burning down would be fatal for most the inhabitants 3000 BC
minus-squareRememberTheApollo_@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down1·5 hours agoYes, maybe… but the point being they could, and often did, rebuild right where they’d been before. Radiation prevents that.
TBF a nuclear incident is not like burning just one house down. It’s burning down the whole city and making it unusable for a decade or ten.
While 100% true for nuclear, the current state of burning fossil fuels is much MUCH worse.
Yes. Over the long term it will render the planet uninhabitable, or at least close enough to it.
I think a town burning down would be fatal for most the inhabitants 3000 BC
Yes, maybe… but the point being they could, and often did, rebuild right where they’d been before. Radiation prevents that.