I just finished part 1 and, well, I’m kinda disappointed. It’s not bad, I think it’s actually pretty solid, but compared to the book it’s much worse in terms of story progression and characters. Some parts felt really rushed. I didn’t expect it to be better than the book, but I still expected better adaptation considering that (at least as far as I know) it was well received and I knew that it didn’t adapt whole book so I expected it to don’t skip too much. Is part 2 any better?

  • GCanuck@lemmy.worldEnglish
    112·
    2 months ago

    Not OP, but I didn’t like what they did to Chani. Kinda felt like that character got done dirty.

    In the books, she was pretty much ride or die. The movie, not so much.

    • Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works
      211·
      2 months ago

      I think that’s a significant improvement. Chani being “ride or die” in the books is an awfully charitable way of saying that she basically has no purpose to her existence outside of Paul. The movie choosing to have her really show some resistance to the shitty / crazy stuff he’s doing gives her more inner life as a character. It also nicely sets up for Messiah where there’s definitely some tension between her and Paul (though never sufficiently explored IMO) over his choice to make Irulan his wife.

      • roofuskit@lemmy.world
        6·
        2 months ago

        Yeah I think her character is ridiculous in the books. She’s a contradiction, a strong skilled warrior who can survive in the harshest conditions. But also will roll over and accept whatever decision her partner makes for her with no complaints.