The Verge has independently confirmed leaked screenshots of the clause in this year’s Team Pixel agreement for the new Pixel phones, which began circulating on X and Threads last night. The agreement tells influencers they’re “expected to feature the Google Pixel device in place of any competitor mobile devices.” It also notes that “if it appears other brands are being preferred over the Pixel, we will need to cease the relationship between the brand and the creator.” The link to the form appears to have since been shut down.

When asked, Google communications manager Kayla Geier told The Verge that “#TeamPixel is a distinct program, separate from our press and creator reviews programs. The goal of #TeamPixel is to get Pixel devices into the hands of content creators, not press and tech reviewers. We missed the mark with this new language that appeared in the #TeamPixel form yesterday, and it has been removed.”

So then what is Team Pixel, exactly? Officially, it’s a program handled by PR agency 1000Heads that seeds early units to influencers and superfans to drum up interest as brand ambassadors. While Google partners with 1000Heads, it doesn’t directly run the program, and there are distinct differences with the traditional reviews program, For example, journalists and influencers in the official reviews program often get briefed and given products under embargo before or during an event. Team Pixel participants get the devices shortly after launch, but before the public — all in exchange for some coverage on social media. For smaller creators, this can be a big leg up in terms of access.

    • paf0@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      You’re such a rebel.

      You’re probably right about the FTC though.

      • MataVatnik@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        20
        ·
        3 months ago

        Thanks brother 💪I owned the first pixel and hated it so much ive been recreationally hating on them ever since

    • TJA!@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      In what way do you think it might violate that regulation? Ads are not forbidden as far as I know?

      • MataVatnik@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        I’m not the most informed on the subject but this is how I understand it,

        I know reviewers are supposed to disclose if they are getting paid by a particular company to promote their products. Though this one probably blurs the line because the reviewers probably said that they are sponsored by Google, so even if they were paid to lie and say they prefer pixel they would have been fine. If they did not disclose that they were sponsored by Google then the influencers could have been in problems, not sure about google.

    • M500@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      As someone who has only used iPhone, can you share why you don’t like pixels?

      If I ever switched to Android a pixel would be my first choice, but mainly because I don’t want a phone with bloat.

      • MataVatnik@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Personally, I found it to be extremely intrusive. It felt like it was optimized for Google to spy on me. I know I had some other issues, but the one that pissed me off the most was an update that completely bricked my phone and made it unusable. Funny that you mention it because I always thought the pixel was a wannabe iPhone.

        I know people like the pixel for putting GrapheneOS on it.