alphacyberranger@sh.itjust.works to Uplifting News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 years agoU.S. proposes ban on airline fees for seating parents next to kidswww.cbsnews.comexternal-linkmessage-square87linkfedilinkarrow-up1653arrow-down17
arrow-up1646arrow-down1external-linkU.S. proposes ban on airline fees for seating parents next to kidswww.cbsnews.comalphacyberranger@sh.itjust.works to Uplifting News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 years agomessage-square87linkfedilink
minus-squareDoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11arrow-down2·2 years agoInb4 the airline companies cry “Chevron” and the Supreme Court gets to decide strike it down.
minus-squareNateNate60@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down1·2 years agoThat’s not what the Chevron doctrine was. The Chevron doctrine stated that courts should defer to agency interpretations of the law.
minus-squaretea@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 years agoOnly in cases of ambiguity or a gap in the law on record.
Inb4 the airline companies cry “Chevron” and the Supreme Court gets to
decidestrike it down.That’s not what the Chevron doctrine was. The Chevron doctrine stated that courts should defer to agency interpretations of the law.
Only in cases of ambiguity or a gap in the law on record.