I would much prefer this piece of shit die in obscurity, thanks

  • kitnaht@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    87
    arrow-down
    24
    ·
    2 months ago

    Imagine believing that Boost specifically developed their own ad network and dictate what is/isn’t on it…

    • Obinice@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      2 months ago

      If you’re not capable of dictating what appears in your own company’s product, maybe that’s something to rethink?

      • cjoll4@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Should Ruben vet the entire Lemmyverse while he’s at it so he can “dictate what appears in his product?”

        As a solo developer with limited resources, one has four choices:

        • Choose an existing ad network and do the best you can within its content preferences,

        • Put a paywall on your app’s features and hope enough people will actually buy it,

        • Work for free, sacrificing your own livelihood, or

        • Don’t develop the app.

        Clearly they all involve a compromise of one form or another, and I trust that Ruben put a lot of thought into the decision.

      • kitnaht@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        It’s not a choice you get. There’s only a handful of ad networks out there, and you get to choose one. If you don’t do that, the only other option is to make people pay for your stuff - which most won’t do because they’re so accustomed to ads.

      • TheGalacticVoid@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        2 months ago

        You can’t force the ad networks to rethink. As a dev, your choice would be to completely paywall the app.