poVoq@slrpnk.netM to Solarpunk@slrpnk.netEnglish · 4 months ago5 Reasons for Environmentalists to Stop Blaming "Doom & Gloom" Narrativesfelixderosen.substack.comexternal-linkmessage-square5fedilinkarrow-up124arrow-down10file-text
arrow-up124arrow-down1external-link5 Reasons for Environmentalists to Stop Blaming "Doom & Gloom" Narrativesfelixderosen.substack.compoVoq@slrpnk.netM to Solarpunk@slrpnk.netEnglish · 4 months agomessage-square5fedilinkfile-text
minus-squarepoVoq@slrpnk.netOPMlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·edit-24 months agoUnrealistic or outright dangerous “solutions” like carbon capture or geo-engineering are probably meant by that.
minus-squareboredsquirrel@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·4 months agoYeah but those are not solutions but small plasters that you can do AND continue to go on like before. Well now we are at a point where we have to stop 100% AND need carbon capture for the remaining 5GT or so CO2eq that we still emit
minus-squareZoboomafoo@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·4 months agoThe main carbon capture I want is reforestation
minus-squareboredsquirrel@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·4 months agoIt is too slow, takes too much space and may burn down. But for sure, removing damn streets and planting trees is a solution, but it is too slow
Unrealistic or outright dangerous “solutions” like carbon capture or geo-engineering are probably meant by that.
Yeah but those are not solutions but small plasters that you can do AND continue to go on like before.
Well now we are at a point where we have to stop 100% AND need carbon capture for the remaining 5GT or so CO2eq that we still emit
The main carbon capture I want is reforestation
It is too slow, takes too much space and may burn down. But for sure, removing damn streets and planting trees is a solution, but it is too slow