• 1rre@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Yeah in 1200-1300 not 700AD, but there is some evidence of eariler voyages to South America and Antarctica

    Also the DNA is the other way around and also a coin flip as to whether it came from Madagascan slaves after the slave trade or from Polynesians hundreds of years earlier, and the sweet potato is also not hard evidence as it could be coincidence, and there is some evidence of it having spread earlier

    However oral history is quite strong in Polynesia and for whatever reason there’s no stories of large landmasses to the east, only icy ones to the south

    Essentially there’s no hard proof like there is with Leif Erikson and Columbus as it was at most a couple of accidental crossings which may not have even been return journeys, but there is a lot of evidence that suggests there was contact of some sort or another

    • Ð Greıt Þu̇mpkin@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 months ago

      IIRC the oral history could be explained, in that the folks on Rapa Nui were actually not the ones sailing to South America, it was actually the other way around.

      Were that the case then South America wouldn’t necessarily be documented in an oral history, just visitors from a far away land.