.

  • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    I’m too used to nano, switching for micro for a while I was constantly using nano key combos and making a mess of things.

    Stockholm syndrome from key combos lol

      • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        It would just be a bit funny since sensible keybindings was one of the reasons I originally switched. Turns out I had already used nano too long for me to actually want that feature hah.

        • kautau@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          8 months ago

          Haha very true, if micro was the default, many people coming from common GUI apps would be like “okay, ctrl z to undo” and “ctrl s to save” “wow, it actually worked”

          • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            8 months ago

            Absolutely. It would make sense as the default instead of nano (or vim of all things). Would help those who are just starting with Linux.

            • kautau@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              8 months ago

              Def! I sort of wish the RFC committee would push standards for smart cross-platform shortcuts. Of course people with muscle memory in a different standard should be able to change for their usage, but even GUI apps like vscode, sublime text, IntelliJ, etc could benefit from standardization there

            • kautau@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              8 months ago

              True, but one keyboard shortcut doesn’t make for an easy transition. Unless nano is has implemented or is planning on implementing on ctrl o,z,f,y,q etc