fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · edit-22 年前i <3 statisticsmander.xyzimagemessage-square102linkfedilinkarrow-up1780arrow-down127file-text
arrow-up1753arrow-down1imagei <3 statisticsmander.xyzfossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · edit-22 年前message-square102linkfedilinkfile-text
Disclaimer: This is a joke. Ecofascism is obviously bad, kids. Don’t be that guy. https://theconversation.com/8-billion-people-why-trying-to-control-the-population-is-often-futile-and-harmful-194369
minus-squareDeceptichum@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up6arrow-down7·2 年前Mate, it’s not tankie to acknowledge that we use far more resources per person compared to the rest of the world.
minus-squareDeceptichum@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·2 年前It only takes ~30k USD to be in the global top 5%.
minus-squareHerrBeter@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·2 年前Yeah, but cost of living differs. Nonetheless, killing people without attributing the actual cause of pollution to the polluters (companies, private or state controlled) is meaningless. Production will kill us all
minus-squareDeceptichum@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 年前Killing people for the environment is fucking stupid, agreed. I’m not in favour of OPs picture.
Mate, it’s not tankie to acknowledge that we use far more resources per person compared to the rest of the world.
The rich far outweigh the plebians
It only takes ~30k USD to be in the global top 5%.
Yeah, but cost of living differs. Nonetheless, killing people without attributing the actual cause of pollution to the polluters (companies, private or state controlled) is meaningless.
Production will kill us all
Killing people for the environment is fucking stupid, agreed.
I’m not in favour of OPs picture.