• A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    Eh, I dont want steam machine becoming a standardized PC.

    having CPU and GPU baked into the board and unchangable will just increase e-waste cause it will age out much faster than a PC which you could, 3-4 years down the line, max out the CPU in, throw more ram into, or upgrade teh GPU, to keep it relevant for another 4+ years

    It serves its niche purpose, but it should not become standard.

    • Coriza@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      I feel the standardization they mean is in the spec and not the specific build. Like, a lot of games are terrible optimized, not only on runtime but also in space needed, it is getting out of hand. But if you have to target a popular machine like steam deck or the steam machine that is not super high-end and have lower capacity storage you have no option but to put some attention on optimizing you game at least a little.

      • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Except that just means they’d optimize for that specific hardware in the steam machine and still run like shit on anything else.

        Power wise, they said the steam machine is equivalent to what 70% of the steam users already have and use. If developers arent already optimizing for that specific block, then one more machine out of thousands wont encourage it.

    • Blackmist@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      A good APU solution like in the consoles would be a nice option though. Especially now with RAM prices through the roof again.