• Hugin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Cephalopod precursors evolved eyes and then brains developed from the eye so their eye is structured correctly.

    Vertebrate precursors evolved the brian first and the eye evolved out the brain as a sensory stub. So it’s upside down and inside out like in picture.

    The nerve cluster goes through the back of the eye splits and folds back to end in light receptors. Light hase to go through the nerves before hitting the sensor.

    There is even a reflective layer after the sensors that gives the sensors a second chance at picking up the light. This is what causes the red eye or green eye you sometimes see in flash photography.

    It would require a genetic rebuild to fix this and the intermediate steps evolution usually use would be so disadvantageous they are selected against. So the right combo of mutations to give us a working octopus eye is VERY unlikely to happen.

    • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 hour ago

      Is this at all related to why the part of the brain that does visual processioning is way in the back? Or is that a dumb question

    • ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Hypothetically, if we managed to make a genetically modified human with the eye that you are talking about, what advantages/disadvantages would it have over our current eyes?

      • squaresinger@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        4 hours ago

        No blind spot and probably better light sensitivity. But it’s not like we really need higher light sensitivity as land-dwellers.

        • nymnympseudonym@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 hours ago

          better light sensitivity

          I like to think of it as “colors and light so brilliant and pretty it’s like tripping shrooms”

          • squaresinger@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 hours ago

            It does, but their eyes still have blind spots and their eyes could possibly be even better if their photoreceptors were oriented towards the incoming light.

    • Tattorack@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Hypothetically, what would be the advantages of “correcting” this evolutionary mistake in humans?

      • Hugin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        4 hours ago

        No blind spot and better light detection. The light having to pass through the nerves causes a lot to be lost.

      • scratchee@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        10 hours ago

        I believe no blind spot, which is the place where all the nerves bundle together and pass through the sensing layer, leaving a hole in our vision (the brain works hard to hide this hole from our perception, but it’s still there and can cause accidents) Also maybe better vision in general?