• Dr Cog@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Not to mention all of the other chemicals!

      Literally every ingredient! Chemicals!

  • Asafum@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    We need to avoid all candy! It’s proven fact that 100% of people that consume candy eventually die, even those that were only exposed to 2nd hand candy!

  • Sasnak@leminal.space
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I love that this fella referred to their self as “the Bobby Yaga.” That’s the energy we need in this world

  • someguy3@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    That’s actually an interesting question, how many of the atoms we have today are directly from the big bang?

    • Masimatutu@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      All of them :)

      Edit: Or none depending on how you see it. No atoms were formed directly at the Big Bang because too hot, but all atoms’ existence is a pretty direct consequence of it

      • someguy3@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        If that’s the case I would say none then. The constitute parts aren’t the item. (How many ships are produced by a forest? None, we use the wood to make the ships.)

    • ℛ𝒶𝓋ℯ𝓃@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      All of them? At what point do we consider new atom formation to not be a part of the big bang? Isn’t it still ongoing, at least until expansion and atomic formation stops?

      • someguy3@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        I would consider a sun forming new atoms to not be atoms from the big bang.