• Daftydux@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    7 days ago

    I dont oppose donald trump because im a democrat or a liberal.

    I oppose donald trump because im not a fucking psychopath.

    Opposing donald trump is so obvious, so common sense, such a bare-minimum, fundamental-level, being a human 101 position that if it isn’t immediately self-evident to you after learning the basic facts, your problem is, much, much deeper than whatever ideology or bias or prejudice you might happen to have. There’s something wrong with you as a person.

    • mad_lentil@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      7 days ago

      Even most of the conservative politicians in the US seemed to take this approach, until he started winning (read also: liberal politicians failed to counter his right-wing populism).

  • MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 days ago

    I mean… I’ve been saying similar stuff for a while. I’m not on anyone’s side specifically. I live far enough away to not be affected by the situation and for my opinion to have no affect on the situation. Simply put: it’s not useful for me to have an opinion, so I don’t have one.

    HOWEVER: I always have and always will oppose the unnecessary death and cruelty happening. Doesn’t matter where, or who, or when… If some group is killing another group, I don’t like that.

    The only good reason to use violence on a global stage is to stop violence; aka self defense. Like what’s happening to the Ukraine, as a simple example. The Ukraine is well within their right to defend themselves and their land from a foreign invader. I am opposed to the Russian army marching across international borders and seizing land by killing whomever tries to stop them and/or whomever is there. Not cool. I dislike Russia’s actions there. I don’t dislike Russia’s or Russians, I don’t have a problem with any individual person. I have a problem with the decision that was made at the highest levels of government to invade.

    Same thing here. I could not care less which side is comprised of what people’s of what culture or religion… I just don’t like that one group is invading/bombing/killing the other. I have no animosity towards those defending themselves, trying to not get killed…

    I don’t know why everyone needs to make every opinion on the matter a question of race, religion, or whatever. I don’t care, just stop murdering eachother.

  • Vazz (He/Him)@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    Isn’t being against war and genocide the same as anti-imperialism? I hate how saying “War is bad” has become so controversial and extremist.

  • gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    I think there will be consequences for Israel’s crimes, just not today.

    Israel is destroying its reputation and its future with its current actions. Yet no power in the world can stop them today, because they have waay too many weapons.

    • the_crotch@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      I think there will be consequences for innocent Jews who have nothing to do with the Israeli genocide. This sort of behavior gives ammo and a perception of legitimacy to antisemites. Israel is making things harder for Jews worldwide for years to come.

    • mad_lentil@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      Have there been consequences for the United States’ or Canada’s genocides against Indigenous peoples? Not really.

      People can just get away with things unless you make them pay for it.

      EDIT case in point, 200 years from now we could be celebrating the jewel of democracy Israel, while “acknowledging its troubled past” but you’re still doing this over the bones of the people your predecessors slaughtered. I’m not even saying it wouldn’t be genuine, like people today in the US and Canada bemoan the actions of previous colonizers. But the fact of what happened remains immutable. The slaughter happened, and the people who committed it accomplished their aims. They got away with it.

    • emergencyfood@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 days ago

      I think there will be consequences for Israel’s crimes, just not today.

      Possibly, but that won’t help the dead kids. The focus must be on stopping the genocide as quickly as possible. Finding and punishing the perps can wait.

  • vorb0te@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    I only know her from claiming there will be no Russian invasion while it already had begun. Later, she is peddling Russian propaganda. Moron.

  • anticurrent@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    7 days ago

    According to a recent pen state uni poll, 80% of Israeli society support the forced removal of Palestinians from Gaza. If we follow the reasoning in this post, the Israeli society is kinda locco ◑﹏◐

    • Hildegarde@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      Either that, or the psychological abuse techniques that militaries do to turn normal people into obedient soldiers are effective. Israel has compulsory military service, so nearly all of the population of the country went through it. That’s how they get that 80% support.

  • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    This astrology grifter is phony AF. She suddenly became political a few years ago by promoting the invasion of ukraine. Peak russian asset.

    Notice the implied anti-semitism and missing zionism. It’s a pattern.

    Please don’t promote this crap just because it sounds “good”. Free Palestine.

    • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      7 days ago

      This astrology grifter is phony AF.

      Ad hominem. Doesn’t invalidate the words above.

      Notice the implied anti-semitism and missing zionism.

      I noticed no implied anti-semitism. I noticed explicit criticism of the Israeli government.

      Please don’t promote this crap just because it sounds “good”.

      True. Promote it to highlight the genocide that is currently occurring.

      Free Palestine.

      Agreed, but I suspect yours isn’t genuine.

      • QuoVadisHomines@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        “She suddenly became political a few years ago by promoting the invasion of ukraine. Peak russian asset.”

        Is it an ad hominem when you include the rest which explains the claim made you excerpted?

        • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          Yes. Any attacking of the messenger to deflect from the message is ad hominem.

          And trying to move the attention from Israeli genocide onto a tangential topic is called forum sliding.

  • Lovable Sidekick@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    One thing I’ve noticed is that many people will accuse you of supporting genocide if you say anything positive about Israel (and by that I mean anything not explicitly negative), or fail to condemn anybody who has failed to condemn Israel, or if you don’t spit immediately after saying the word “Israel”. Same if you point out that the Biden administration in November was actively negotiating the ceasefire that went into effect a day or two after Trump’s inauguration, even as people were calling Harris a nazi and refusing to vote for her because she was “complicit”. It’s like people expect world politics and diplomacy to operate at the same speed as meme outrage.

  • But_my_mom_says_im_cool@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    I agree with all this but I feel like Americans are the last people who should lead such a movement. To so many of us, the ones your country has raped and destroyed without apology, i roll my eyes at Americans calling for the end of colonization, genocides and war. It’s like you guys think if you go hard on this war, it will forgive all the centuries of genocide. My people were treated like refuse by Americans for decades, then without apology or reparations , white American kids are now preaching at my indigenous ass about privilege and genocide.

    You can’t even call out the hypocrisy or you get hated on. I’ve never experienced as much hate and racism towards my culture from the left, as I have this past 2 years. You expect that shit from the right, but the American left went insane this cycle too

    • FauxLiving@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      7 days ago

      The people that treated your people like refuse are not the same people as the ones protesting against atrocities.

      Lumping a whole population together and stereotyping them is wrong, no matter who you’re targeting with your stereotypes.

      • Katana314@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        It certainly gets complicated when America is such a melting pot, and it’s consistently the white overlords who engineer those atrocities.

        And yes, many, but not all, of the white underlings choose to give them their full support. As a white underling throwing them the middle finger, I have no idea why.

        • smol_beans@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          7 days ago

          Shut up, killing innocent civilians is a war crime. It doesn’t matter what your justification is, killing civilians is wrong and if you don’t feel bad about it you are broken inside.

          • Allah@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            8
            ·
            edit-2
            7 days ago

            no one is saying it is right smart ass, i am just saying you should accuse the entity that militarizes civillian areas

            • h4lf8yte@lemmy.ml
              cake
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              edit-2
              7 days ago

              As I know we have no other information source about hamas using civilian infrastructure like hospitals as military bases than the IDF. That’s because no external journalists are allowed in gaza by the IDF. And in the beginning exactly this IDF also claimed they don’t target hospitals and it was a hamas rocket that hit the biggest hospital of gaza. Now there is not a single hospital left. So maybe we shouldn’t believe this kind of information. Also there are other methods than bombing the whole area if the enemy is really using civilian infrastructure as military bases. So it’s still on the attacker if civilians die. Especially if the attacker has massive military capacities and options for other methods like in the case of the IDF.

            • smol_beans@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              7 days ago

              It doesn’t matter what your justification is, killing civilians is wrong

              Do you know how to read?

              IT DOESN’T MATTER WHAT YOUR JUSTIFICATION IS

                • smol_beans@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  7 days ago

                  The people that drop bombs on civilians are responsible for killing civilians.
                  The people who starve a population are responsible for starving a population.

                  IT DOESN’T MATTER WHAT THE JUSTIFICATION IS

    • BrainInABox@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      The allies didn’t try to completely wipe out the population of Germany to replace them with their own colonists.

    • mad_lentil@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      What’s your point with this? That the allies were right to bomb civilians? That we can have a little genocide, as a treat?

      • Allah@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        collateral damage bad, but Germans using civilians as human shield also bad, so blame should be on germans not allies

    • porous_grey_matter@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      This is like saying “well are you just gonna ignore that some Jewish bankers are doing nefarious crimes?” in 1943.

      It is absolutely fucking negligible in comparison, not to mention directly funded by Israel so that they would have an excuse for their indiscriminate slaughter. Give Palestinians a country, their homes, and restitution for decades of apartheid and then we can talk about what kind of problem Hamas is.

        • InputZero@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          7 days ago

          Let’s compare the numbers, so far a 1200 Israeli’s were murdered on the opening day, and maybe 100 more deaths from combat. Total deaths 1300-ish. In the Gaza strip alone over 62,000-ish people have been killed. Using Israel’s numbers from before the war they estimated maybe 50,000 active Hamas members. It’s orders of magnitude different. Even assuming Hamas died first that still means Israel murdered 12,000 innocent people. Hamas is bad, but the state of Israel is a genocidal monster.

          • BrainInABox@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 days ago

            62,000 is the number of confirmed munitions deaths and it’s been frozen for months. The actual total killed has been estimated in the arena of half a million.

          • IhaveCrabs111@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            7 days ago

            There will always be collateral damage even though it’s very hard to justify and basically impossible to justify when there’s children involved. I will point out that the line between Hamas combatant and “civilian” can be very grey. Palestinians voted for Hamas knowing they had a mandate to destroy Israel. On the oct 7 attacks Hamas were joined by non combatants. Imagine your army marching down your street on their way to kill your neighbour so you put down what you’re doing to join them and kill your neighbour too. This is basically what happened

        • Doorbook@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          7 days ago

          For anyone seeing this comment this nunber also a lie. Last proven around 700 or 800 killed ignoring how many killed by Israeli themselves shilling homes where hamas had israeli hostages and cars that trying to get into gaza with hostages.

          • IhaveCrabs111@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            7 days ago

            That makes it ok I suppose. And I’m sure Gaza would have been leveled if hamas decided to kill zero too.

        • BrainInABox@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          7 days ago

          They didn’t kill 1200, and even if they had, that number is negligible compared to the amount of Palestinians Israel had already murdered before October 7th, and basically 0 compared to how many they’ve killed since.

          You just only care about white people.

    • Corn@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      7 days ago

      You’re just ignoring the Germans butchered in the warsaw uprising? I am definitely not a psychopath and there was definitely a good reason for a bunch of German “civilians” to be outside a ghetto in a foreign country.

      • IhaveCrabs111@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        7 days ago

        Didn’t hamas march into Israel and were joined by non combatants then butcher and kidnap 1200? Seems different

        • Corn@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          7 days ago

          The place they marched into is where their parents and grandparents lived before Israel ethnically cleansed it, driving them into the ghetto they’re currently in.

          • IhaveCrabs111@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            7 days ago

            Still non combatants. Are you saying the indigenous people of your country should be allowed to kill anyone who lives there now?

            • Corn@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              7 days ago

              There’s a difference in time scale here; there’s still living people who remember the nakba. But indigenous people are absolutely justified in resisting their own oppression. Also the immediate purpose of getting hostages was to get Israel to release hostages it took first.

    • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      Yeah didn’t OP know that it’s illegal to mention Israel’s crimes without also mentioning Hamas in the same sentence?

    • RadioFreeArabia@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      Which side is guilty of genocide? Which side are the invaders and settlers, and which side are the indigenous resistance?

      Hamas aren’t fighting Jews in Europe or North America, they are resisting those who have stolen their lands and besieged them.

      • IhaveCrabs111@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        7 days ago

        October 7 wasn’t resisting. It was butchery. And pretending it wasn’t is psychopathy. Israel’s government is very much in the wrong too

      • IhaveCrabs111@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        Thank you for an intelligible response. If we run the hypothetical of what would have happened if Israel allowed hamas to become its own country with its own military, how likely would Hamas have used that power along with help from it’s neighbours like Iran, to develop nuclear weapons or at least a strong conventional army? If there was ever a fork in the road it would be when the Palestinian people elected Hamas knowing their mandate was the total destruction of Israel. They carried out that mandate with everything they were given from Israel and the international community. They used it all to buy rockets and build tunnels for themselves for use for when Israel retaliated. The fact civilians are being killed is part of hamas’s plan to get more international support, no civilians are allowed in the tunnels. Judging by this website it appears to be working well. I really wish we could have seen what happened if Israel withdrew from the West Bank and allowed the Palestinians time to live their lives. There is absolutely blame on both sides.