Nothing more disappointing to me than seeing a game I might enjoy… and then it’s only available on PC on Epic Games store. Why can’t it be available on Epic, Xbox game store and Steam? It’s so annoying, like you have no choice but to use Epic… which I would literally do ANYTHING not to use.

  • ampersandrew@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    23 days ago

    Speaking for myself, if it’s Epic only, it means I have no assurances as a customer that they’re going to keep letting me play the game on Linux. If I bought Alan Wake II, I’m doing so knowing that they don’t support my operating system and could break compatibility with Wine with any random update. If that happens on Steam, I can reasonably expect a refund if it was previously Verified, and because of the verification system, they also have an incentive not to break compatibility. So if I play Alan Wake II some day, it’ll be because it was a free giveaway on Epic, because I’m not paying for that.

    • MudMan@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      23 days ago

      Yeah, that’s true on Steam as well.

      There are a whole bunch of games that actively removed compatibility with SteamOS, and Linux by extension. Apex Legends was the most recent and the most vocal about it.

      • Zorque@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        23 days ago

        That was on the developers, not the storefront, though. Epic has specifically decided they don’t give a flying fuck about Linux.

        • MudMan@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          23 days ago

          Well, you still don’t get to play it, and you sure as hell aren’t getting a refund, so I’m not entirely sure how that changes the situation at all.

          • Zorque@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            23 days ago

            … because now your weird obsession with blaming Steam for all things going wrong with gaming has less ground to stand on?

            • MudMan@fedia.io
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              23 days ago

              Because not having a game available is not having a game available. You still, and I can’t believe I have to type this twice, don’t get to play the stupid game.

              For the record, I blamed Steam for nothing here. Some guy said he feels more assured that Steam will keep Linux compatibility, I pointed out that this is not the case. It’s not even Steam’s fault, compatibility is being dropped either for technical reasons or due to anticheat, and there is no indication that it will be any different with Epic going forward.

              • Laurel Raven@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                22 days ago

                What they said, exactly:

                If that happens on Steam, I can reasonably expect a refund if it was previously Verified, and because of the verification system, they also have an incentive not to break compatibility.

                Emphasis mine.

                They didn’t say it won’t happen. They said they have far more confidence that it’ll be much less likely to happen. And that they have a reasonable expectation of refund if the developer pulls that.

                There are no guarantees here, but Valve has put a lot of time and effort into making Linux games work, and Epic has not. No, they can’t stop developers from pulling those stunts, but they’re no more happy about it than we are and, from everything I’ve been seeing, are actively working on getting developers to stop doing that.

                Also, the anticheat excuse is mostly a lie, the ones Destiny 2, Rust, and Apex Legends use are compatible with Linux, and just require, as I understand it, checking a box and including a file in a specific spot, so those are just outright anti Linux for the sake of hating Linux and Linux gamers.

                • MudMan@fedia.io
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  22 days ago

                  Yeah, but that’s not a reasonable expectation, is it? Because it’s happened multiple times and nobody got anything refunded.

                  So there is no meaningful incentive and no reasonable expectation, demonstrably.

                  And, for the record, the Apex Legends guys at least didn’t say they couldn’t support Linux or the Deck. They used to, in fact. They actively pulled support because they said they saw disproportionately more cheating under those platforms. I have no idea if that’s true, but it’s certainly what they said. It sure doesn’t sound like that’ll change anytime soon, unless Windows enacts the same restrictions on Kernel-level access or Linux develops some equivalent.

                  I’d say that’s probably a distant priority over, I don’t know, getting decent Nvidia support, but knowing the way Linux progresses that may absolutely not be true.

                  • Laurel Raven@lemmy.zip
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    22 days ago

                    Well, of the three I mentioned, 2 are free to play, and the other they did issue refunds for Linux players… Which ones were you thinking of?

          • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            23 days ago

            No, you see it’s different because Steam is love and Gabe is perfection, you know?

            • MudMan@fedia.io
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              23 days ago

              The level of quasi-religious fervor is… kind of scary. Especially given that it’s over this one billionare techbro. I mean, good for them, they have a great product and a better understanding of how to make money with only light enshittification, but still…

              • Laurel Raven@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                22 days ago

                If and when they do something shitty, I’ll be right there with you calling them out for it, but I don’t see anything here that fits that description

                • MudMan@fedia.io
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  22 days ago

                  Well, they refused to offer refunds for a long time after people like EA and GOG had already implemented it, and only relented when forced by regulators. And they screwed up their Green Light process for a long time despite every developer telling them it sucked. There’s the ongoing use of loot boxes and monetized UGC, of course. Your tolerance for that one may vary.

                  I think Valve makes very good software and good hardware, and they have a way better handle on where they can squeeze users versus side with them than pretty much anybody else in the industry.

                  But, you know, they’re a corpo ran by a reclusive techbro, they’re still frequently sketchy.

                  Which is also very much true of GOG and CD Projekt, for the record.

        • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          23 days ago

          What do you mean, are you on some client that has notifications disabled by default?

          Genuine fediverse noob here.

          • Da Bald Eagul@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            23 days ago

            The guy you’re replying to was joking, saying they are in charge of your notifications.

            Lemmy notifications depend on the client you’re using. I’m using Sync which is far from perfect with push notifs, usually they only pop up when I open the app.

            • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              23 days ago

              I am just using the browser UI, and just mean the notifications on the site.

              Sometimes I get a reply with no notification even within Lemmy, and someone else said this happens to them too.

              • ampersandrew@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                23 days ago

                I think sometimes they’re just slow, so you may have clicked into the thread before it found out you needed a notification. I’m not an expert though. It’s just a guess based on personal experience.