There are edge cases. Older ports, notably Total War and Civilization plus a few other edge cases I’ve found, will either crash when trying to talk to each other or refuse to do it. You can likely sidestep all of these issues by just running the Windows version via Proton instead. I believe the problems those ports had were something to do with underlying libraries and how they keep time, but I admit I don’t know for sure.
I know you mentioned this game to me in this community in the last couple of days, and now this update came along and surprised us all. Would you mind confirming if a dedicated server can be spun up for local play only, with no internet? And if so, does the game have bots to fill out a private server?
Dropping the first bit of proper news on Steam since early 2024 after the release of Battlefield 6 is certainly a choice
Not a terrible one. 4 people can play this game for less than the price of one person playing Battlefield 6. You can capture everyone that’s on a budget or can’t play BF6 due to Secure Boot requirements.
Yup, I think so, too. It was too important and influential, and there’s too much of a gap in the market, for that to not happen.
It’s a night and day difference compared to Nvidia.
We’ve got tons of new types of games that have emerged over the years, but they sprout up at different levels of system requirements. The games that need the new hardware are the ones with the largest development budgets.
See, I was way more into the Halo era of shooters that you weren’t as much of a fan of. I’m sure the pendulum will swing back again, but it just hasn’t happened yet. Doom 2016, for instance, was a game I enjoyed, but I was absolutely not looking for more of it by the time I finished it. Metal: Hellsinger was a good twist on Doom’s formula and got me more interested in playing it than Eternal or Dark Ages did. But outside of that, I can’t say I’m too hungry for that kind of shooter. I’m more interested in Phantom Fury than Ion Fury.
Nah, this is about where the last two console cycles would release new hardware. It’s the confluence of a lot of things at work here.
At the very least, the console cycles are a good indicator of when it makes sense to build a new PC.
I like many kinds. Split-screen multiplayer is great; privately hosted servers that work on LAN without a call home are great; both are rare. I know there’s been a resurgence of “boomer shooters” that harken back to the mid to late 90s, and I can appreciate one of those every now and then, but the kind I miss most are the ones that came out of Half-Life, from the late 90s until the 2010s. They typically had a campaign and a deathmatch built out of reused assets from the campaign. Maybe there was co-op to the campaign. Maybe there was capture the flag. Battlefield’s thing is Conquest, and that’s still great. I hunted down a copy of Battlefield 2 and booted up my old copy of Star Wars: Battlefront II (2005) to get my fix lately, lol.
Sure, but for every Under Night, there’s a DNF Duel that comes in well under the likes of MK. Even if the trend line is going down for NRS, it’s still consistently high enough to track, and the era post-MK9 has done better than pre-. MK1 was supposed to be the one they supported long-term, like their competitors do, to hone in on that better game, but it misfired. A misfire for MK is still better financially than Street Fighter or Tekken on most good days, and it can be attributed to many things (only new gen hardware, rushed out the door, no advance beta to work on system mechanics, a total misread of the audience’s interest in kameos, etc.), but this wasn’t the one. Rumor has it Injustice 3 is around the corner, and like the Sonic cycle, fans will hope this is the one where they nail it, but I think people keep hoping that because they’re not far off from being able to do so.
It’s frustrating too, because other than maybe their attitude toward unblockables in their core systems design, they never seem to make the same mistakes twice. I don’t think any WB shakeup has a high chance of improving the NRS situation, but regardless of one, they’d be crazy not to keep a regular release cadence. Their single player and couch multiplayer experiences have been superb, head and shoulders above their competition, for a long time now, and people show up to pay for that. (But I’m grouchy that they replaced the Krypt with the significantly worse Invasions mode.)
Of course it is. This is the same scenario as the Age of Empires thing. Most people pick one character that speaks to them most and then stick with it, which has a high chance of being in the main roster, even if you got all the DLC. If you’re only playing on the couch with friends, you’d never even know if any other characters ever came out. Depending on how the game handles it, if you’re playing online against people with the DLC, there might be a problem with going into training mode to figure out how to beat that DLC character; this is a problem that’s trickier to solve than you might think, but devs have been trying to address it lately.
The developer of this game is a little bit of a mystery, but it smells like it’s composed of the former devs behind Diesel Legacy (which sold for $30 and had no DLC) and Them’s Fightin’ Herds (which sold for $15 and one season of DLC), and that means this team is quite small.
“Their last few games” spans about a decade, yes. When given the choice to pick eight main stage games by number of entrants, NRS games make the list. Their ratio is horrible compared to copies sold, but they still pull more entrants than most. Believe me: I’d prefer my favorite indie fighting game could pull better numbers than MK too, but it doesn’t.
To use your analogy, they sold you a car, then you added aftermarket components like a new sound system and a spoiler. 10-12 characters at launch is a complete fighting game. It’s not like they’ve got these characters ready to go. The ones they add, and how they play, come down to feedback on what the game needs most, and the devs almost never have the resources to do all of them, nor will they have the foresight to know that until it’s been in the community’s hands.
Yes it did. The last two Smash games both did. What they’re doing now is (more or less) what players asked for, to replace the old model. You used to have to buy Street Fighter II for full price like 4 or 5 times. Now you buy Street Fighter 6 once and buy characters after the fact. There are a few regressions here, but your history is not correct.
I can just about guarantee you this game will cost less than $60 and is made by a small team.
That’s not true. MK always improves something and walks something else back, but the last few games have been their largest competitive community by a significant margin.
I’d rather people get paid when they work hard to add stuff to a video game.
I never played the MKs from that era, but they do not have a great reputation compared to the modern games. There is a competitive game to be played here too, and a new one every year doesn’t really give any one of them time to breathe.
I was watching V for Vendetta, a movie about how people allow a fascist government to replace a democracy, because it was November 5th, a crucial political date in that story.