• 0 Posts
  • 20 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 11th, 2023

help-circle







  • Don’t look into any details if you want to keep that opinion

    Any details
    • Only adults may consume and/or own cannabis
    • No buying, selling or giving away weed
    • Only consuming cannabis you or your Cannabis Social Club (CSC), should you join one, grew is allowed. In a CSC cannabis may be grown and sold to its members
    • CSCs may not make profits
    • No more than 50 (30 if you are younger than 21) grams of cannabis per month may be handed out to you by your CSC
    • No cannabis with more than 10% THC may be handed out to people younger than 21
    • Consuming cannabis within 100 meters (visual range) of a playground, school, youth center, public sports facilities or CSCs is prohibited
    • Consuming cannabis between 7am and 8pm in a pedestrian zone is prohibited
    • Consuming cannabis “close” to minors is prohibited
    • No CSC may be established within 200 meters of a school or playground
    • max 500 members per CSC
    • no more than 1 CSC per 6000 city residents (or 1 CSC if the city/town has less than 6000 residents)
    • no extracting THC from cannabis
    • no owning more than 3 cannabis plants
    • no owning more than 50 grams of dried cannabis, including plants
    • no carrying around more than 25 grams of dried cannabis, including plants
    • CSCs have to keep meticulous records about their members, who received when how much cannabis and how much cannabis grew in total
    • police can just go and take these records without requiring a judge’s approval
    • for the coming months: no driving a car or bicycle with more than 1 ng of THC in your blood or you will lose your car driver’s license and pay a fine (yes, even if you’re caught riding your bicycle, you will lose your car driver’s license). Fun fact: the police announced they will significantly increase controls










  • AI and robotics companies don’t want this to happen. OpenAI, for example, has reportedly fought to “water down” safety regulations and reduce AI-quality requirements. According to an article in Time, it lobbied European Union officials against classifying models like ChatGPT as “high risk,” which would have brought “stringent legal requirements including transparency, traceability, and human oversight.” The reasoning was supposedly that OpenAI did not intend to put its products to high-risk use—a logical twist akin to the Titanic owners lobbying that the ship should not be inspected for lifeboats on the principle that it was a “general purpose” vessel that also could sail in warm waters where there were no icebergs and people could float for days.

    What would’ve been high risk? Well:

    In one section of the White Paper OpenAI shared with European officials at the time, the company pushed back against a proposed amendment to the AI Act that would have classified generative AI systems such as ChatGPT and Dall-E as “high risk” if they generated text or imagery that could “falsely appear to a person to be human generated and authentic.”

    That does make sense, considering ELIZA from the 60s would fit this description. It pretty much repeated what you wrote to it in a different style.

    I don’t see how generative AI can be considered high risk when it’s literally just fancy keyboard autofill. If a doctor asks ChatGPT what the correct dose of medication for a patient is, it’s not ChatGPT which should be considered high risk but rather the doctor.