Victor

Hey, my pleasure! I always like to share what I enjoy, so I hope it’ll be to your taste in the end. 🤞❤️

I’m playing Jusant right now. It’s one of the best non-combat games I’ve ever played I think.

You play as a climber who tries to make it up a towering mountain/rock tower, and you find letters along the way that tell the story of what has happened to the world and the inhabitants of the tower. All the water seems to have disappeared from around where the tower is located. Ships and boats decorate the desert around the tower. Some letters are found in chronological order as you go up the tower, following certain characters, indicating they also made the climb up. Others are in reverse chronological order, indicating the need to incrementally descend the tower as the water level decreased. In those, you can tell the desperation and mindset of the people changing as things got worse, but more relaxed the higher up you get.

The exposition is simple reading of text, but in combination with the story it makes it very interesting.

The gameplay is super fun: it’s challenging enough to be entertaining, easy enough to be chill. Simple yet engaging controls.

The art style is very cool IMO. The world is not textured. The developers instead relied solely on very detailed colored and shaded geometry to convey texture, leveraging UE5’s nanite and lumen systems respectively. And I have to say, there’s a lot of detail in the geometry and in the amount of world objects. It really brings life to the game world.

Very difficult to put down. I think about wanting to play/finish it when I’m doing other things. 😅 Haven’t had that feeling with many games.

9/10

Captain Toad’s Treasure Hunt is quite relaxing if you’re into puzzles and Mario games.

You’re a saint. Not everyone thinks like you.

I clicked before seeing your comment but I had to commend you anyway. Have a good one, mate.

God’s work, son. 🤝

This is what I imagine the Reddit developers think of themselves as. 😆

everything I’ve seen for radarr, sonarr, overseerr, etc. require docker

Back when I was using Sonarr a couple years ago before that really good free tracker died, I wasn’t using docker at all. Just a systemd unit for the server and one for the web interface I believe, or maybe just the one for both. I’m on Arch.

I hope that helps.

Keep the database on an SSD. I put mine on a HDD and it corrupted.

That seems very odd to me, and a very serious bug, no? 🤨 I feel like the storage medium shouldn’t matter as long as it can keep up with data throughput (or eventually keep up, with some help with buffering via the kernel or some other mechanism).

pass the gpu into the container

Man, if the “Download more RAM!” scammers of old could see us now.

but I’m super disenchanted on docker after this thread if I’m being honest

What made you feel that way? (I’m not too familiar with docker much tbh and I’m thinking of hosting on a Pi just like you.)

I thought IIFE’s usually looked like (function (...params) {})(...args). That’s not the latest way? To be honest I never used them much, at least not after arrow functions arrived.

People are down voting you when you are just expressing a feeling. I don’t think that’s right, but I hope you stay for the other great content on Lemmy and only go to Reddit for the missing stuff.

lol, you’d really have to go out of your way in this scenario. First implement a way to get every single permutation of a list, then to ahead with the asinine solution. 😆 But yes, nice one! Your imagination is impressive.

So there’s yet another level of quirkery to this bullshit then, it seems. 😆 Nice digging! 🤝

I also noticed that if you surround the curlies with parentheses, you get the same again:

> eval('{} + []')
0
> eval('({}) + []')
'[object Object]'

I guess, yeah, that’ll do it. Although that’d probably be yet one or a few extra factors involving n.

In node, I get the same result in both cases. "[object Object]"

It’s calling the toString() method on both of them, which in the array case is the same as calling .join(",") on the array. For an empty array, that results in an empty string added to "[object Object]" at either end in the respective case in the picture.

Not sure how we’d get 0 though. Anybody know an implementation that does that? Browsers do that maybe? Which way is spec compliant? Number([]) is 0, and I think maybe it’s in the spec that the algorithm for type coercion includes an initial attempt to convert to Number before falling back to toString()? I dunno, this is all off the top of my head.

My mental model of it is a chain, yes. But you can define it however you like. It’s just steps in some direction.

Maybe a cake would suit someone the best.

Exactly. For every level of abstraction, the abstractor is the high level and the abstractee is the lower level. Those aren’t real words perhaps, but you get what I’m saying. It’s all relative along the chain of abstraction.

How in the hell does anyone f— up so bad they get O(n!²)? 🤯 That’s an insanely quickly-growing graph.

Curious what the purpose of that algorithm would have been. 😅

Comapnies 🥺