Planet X will be what Mars is renamed to once Elon takes it over

He looks like he knew what was going to happen. Modern day equivalent would be to suggest naming a planet ligma

Somehow I think Hitler was worse than /u/spez

This man is a hero:

I suppose volume is the best measurement of “big”

eh. He caused people to give Lemmy a go, leading to the wonderful communities we have here, so he can’t be that bad

Have a nice day!

Attributing someone as the “mother” or “father” of anything is a stupid simplification. Probably some dumb American thing. It’s just stupid. Not only does it imply that there can only be one female and/or male with this title for any given field (“the”), it can be inaccurate. In general by making this simplification you are setting two different standards of contribution, which goes against any idea of equality. I’d rather consider them substantial contributors. That way these arguments are completely avoided.

It’s very loose terminology. We call Oppenheimer the father of the atomic bomb when Einstein, etc laid the foundation for the technology. It’s a stupid thing to be arguing about

It’s the 21st Century now. There is no authoritive source of information, they should’ve added a link to back themselves up. Looking through Wikipedia, calling her the “Mother of WiFi” is a bit rich when there were probably other women more directly involved in WiFi who are more deserving of that title. But she is just the character required to appease the Twitter mob for another day

He’s the guy in the comment asking for evidence. Which I don’t think is wrong, but it seems like he could’ve done some research and they could’ve posted a link for anyone who wanted to know more

… Or Incorrect apostrophe, unless they meant “it is”

Gave up on office a couple of years ago when I discovered bastet:

For people who enjoy swearing at their computer, Bastet (short for Bastard Tetris) is an attractive alternative to Microsoft Word.

https://github.com/fph/bastet/

Nintendo would bomb aid workers if they thought they were carrying yuzu source code

Yes certainly some nasty reports out there. Even the reviews that show up in GNOME software are a bit nasty

You still are not reading what I said correctly. The problem is they said in the bug report that it is “High Priority”. That’s a bit pushy. It’s up to the maintainers to work out what’s “High Priority”. You completely missed the point.

It’s not that they made a big report. It’s that they, a multi-billion dollar company, had the nerve to mark it as “High Priority” and request that a volunteer fix it for them so their proprietary commercial product would work. It’s that they do nothing for the project but expect the world from it. That’s the problem.

I’ve got nothing against bug reports, infact I’ve made some myself, they help development. Demanding they are fixed is a different thing entirely.

Sorry if my previous comment sounded like an insult.

I’m not really sure what you’re saying here. Microsoft have every right to fix the bug themselves and the maintainer has every right not to. Open source software doesn’t come with a warranty in most licensed.

$29.99? Must’ve been a formatting issue because there should be some more numbers out front or at least tell me we’ve got a premium solution with a 60% guarantee