• 0 Posts
  • 208 Comments
Joined 11 months ago
cake
Cake day: August 26th, 2023

help-circle

  • Any “secure” so that relies on someone else for security is not secure.

    Fuck the scope of E2EE.

    When someone has FSB/NSA agent behind them reading messages, no amount of encryption will help. Biggest cybersecurity vulnreability is located between monitor and chair. When you are texting someone else, that someone else’s chair-monitor space is also vulnreable.

    Signal makes a lot of claims on their website that are laughable.

    Well, maybe. I didn’t read their claims, nor I use signal.

    Attachments are stored unencrypted, keys in plaintext.

    Is OS-level encryption plaintext or not? If yes, then they are encrypted, provided user enables such feature in OS. If not - nothing if encrypted fundamentally.

    If they were serious about security, they would depricate the windows app and block it from their servers.

    WTF does Apple have to do with anything?

    You just used applefans’ argument. Yeah, I wonder what.





  • But, but, “just use disk encryption”. Just…no…WTF?

    So not encrypting keys is bad, but actually encrypting them is bad too? Ok.

    Any on of your recipients could be using the desktop app and there’s no way to know unless they tell you.

    Another applefan? How it THIS supposed to be in scope of E2EE? Moreover, how having a way to know if recepient is using desktop app is not opposite of privacy?

    On top of that, all messages filter through Signal’s servers, adding a single-point-of-failure to everything. Take away the servers, no more Signal.

    Indeed. This is why I use Matrix. Also, fuck showing phone numbers to everyone(I heard they did something about it) and registration with phone numbers.