It should be easy to distinguish a bot from a real user though, isn’t it?
Runterwählen ist kein Gegenargument.
[Verifying my cryptographic key: openpgp4fpr:941D456ED3A38A3B1DBEAB2BC8A2CCD4F1AE5C21]
It should be easy to distinguish a bot from a real user though, isn’t it?
How does it defend a website to deny reading access to static content?
The content posted here has no obvious license. I wonder if an administrator could just put any license of his choice on your posts.
I wonder why I don’t pay for Lemmy.
deleted by creator
I know, but most people won’t. :-)
One of the reasons might be that the number of SVN hosting facilities has decreased over the past two decades.
I know, but most people are lazy these days (and self-hosting stuff in the EU has become a legal battle against every week’s new rules).
Oh, come on. It wasn’t that bad! At least it granted (and still grants) the freedom of choosing which VCS shall make your day harder than necessary.
Codeberg is supposedly located in the EU while not requiring self-hosting, maybe that’s why.
At least they’re less obvious about it.
the vast amount of projects hosted there definitely won’t ever move away.
That’s what they said about Sourceforge though.
Good news. Hopefully this will help to finally break the de facto monopoly of Microsoft’s GitHub and bring the distributed aspect of Git - away from gatekeeper platforms - back into the foreground.
I read a lot of music-related blogs, review sites and a few selected magazines. No online “recommendation system” needed.
WordPerfect is still quite awesome, given that it has Reveal Codes. However, the older I am, the more I grow to like WordStar (and its free clone).
I did. TinyMCE is still less comfy to use in my opinion. Of course, that’s probably a matter of taste. Also, I wonder when Automattic will stop supporting it.
How would a hacker even notice the difference between a Linux server and.a Linux desktop? Those are the same thing.
Gee, I wonder whether it’s possible to have zero-day exploits on Linux and 7-Zip.
It depends. The RAR5 format used by newer WinRAR versions (the “old” one is still supported just well) can have smaller archives than 7z, but the opposite is also true. Still, yes, WinRAR is in my experience faster and more stable.
(Note that “as small as possible” is not usually the most relevant point. The best compression is currently reached with the ZPAQ format, but using it with maximum compression settings is painfully slow.)
Good point, thank you. Uh… beep!