That’s besides the point and rises the suspicion that this is somewhat politically motivated. You have to judge them on how they behave in lemmy.world communities.
That’s besides the point and rises the suspicion that this is somewhat politically motivated. You have to judge them on how they behave in lemmy.world communities.
It would be good practice if admins would link a selection of the offensive material. That would allow both sides to debate how they judge such behavior.
Right now there are celebrating comments but I haven’t seen bad behavior myself, even in heated debates. That let’s me assume that many are thin skinned or unable to refute lemmygrad’s political opinion.
If I understand lemmy correctly then banning lemmygrad will prevent its users from participating in any debate on a lemmy. world community. Does a lemmy instance exist that federated with everybody where important communities should be hosted?
There is an almost daily submission like https://lemm.ee/post/11169186 that reminds everybody that Brave is problematic but they seem close to handling donations and subscriptions.
Is another option needed or could Brave be adjusted into something that can be supported? Would it be enough if that problematic guy left Brave?
That’s where you have to do things that don’t scale. Which content has to be put on peertube that boosts growth? It’s something for a new answer.
Do you know who is running piped.video?
That’s the question. How can reach or content be increased?
Hundreds of years wasted pretending to be Roman elite when they manage cities the size of villages.
What can be done to strengthen peertube so that adblockers aren’t needed at all?
What are the biggest showstoppers?
That was at times of DES. Cryptography that is used today is proven to be complicated enough that it’s unbreakable unless the government got quantum computing working at sufficient skale.
Like others wrote, attacks will happen when the messages are received and decrypted.
I don’t object the creation. I just want to know why there is that discrepancy.
I have been browsing /new since about a week and this is the third anti-brave submission that I see there.
Why are there daily posts against Brave but not against other browsers? Is Google more trustworthy than Brave?
They can be upset. As somebody seeing the post on the all-channel, it’s strange that they start and finish the post with pointing out the lead dev when there is no clear sign that he is involved.
Impeccable taste, the new requirement for programmers.
Will there ever be not a bubble? What else but games is there to create when everything is automated?
To stay obvious, what’s fascinating is that those networks are small, its members the most intelligent people available and they meet each other regularly in person at conferences.
Why do they accept the lock-in?
It’s inherent to grants. If you want scientists to choose their topics you have to fund them unconditionally.
To mention the obvious, it’s the same network effect that keeps people on X and Reddit.
You could try to change the browser ID string that is sent with every request.