I considered doing this a few months ago. I ultimately decided that for my use, it’s easy enough to just memorize the road network in my city, so I did that instead. This was the navigation software I was planning to use: https://github.com/navit-gps/navit
I’m sorry, but using data from US averages (largely representative of single-family-home suburbs) to make sweeping statements about how urban living is bad is simply misleading and borderline irresponsible. Living in a multi-family building, living without a car, getting electricity from renewables, and using electricity for heating and cooking is insanely energy efficient. It takes advantage of density to reduce infrastructure needs, and can benefit from having resources developed / farmed at scale, further reducing energy and emissions.
If you need ANY infrastructure to connect your “shire” to anywhere else, you need to include that in your analysis. It will have a massive impact. Need a car? You’ve already lost. The road infrastructure per capita alone will put you over the edge, let alone the infrastructure required to build and maintain said car or the emissions from the car itself if not electric.
It’s becoming more common, but it mostly comes down to available tooling. At this point all three of the big game engines have a Vulkan backend available, but that’s a fairly recent development. And if a developer isn’t using a game engine, writing their own openGL renderer is easy, and writing a Vulkan renderer is a nightmare.
Its 4 EUR per 3 months or 11 EUR per year
I use the floccus extension with Nextcloud as a backend for bookmarks/tabs and wallabag for read-it-later
This hugo theme works well: https://jamstackthemes.dev/theme/hugo-lynx/
for a non-self-hosted, but neat alternative: https://weird.one/
kinda related: I get that you gotta make money in this world, and I’m happy to pay for a book, but it always makes me so sad when authors don’t offer DRM-free eBooks, especially when the content is about ending capitalism. This is even worse because, not only do they only have a DRM-laden option, but they also only selling it on Amazon.
It’s really frustrating how common this is.
Not self hosted necessarily, but TagStudio is an interesting project worth keeping an eye on https://docs.tagstud.io/
same here
It sounds like what they ultimately want is one place to look at both read-it-later stuff and starred RSS articles. My read is that they are proposing one way to do it, but ultimately it’s not super workable that way. There are no clients I know of that are both RSS clients and read-it-later clients (using pocket, wallabag, or anything else).
If OP wants one place to see both, their best bet is to find a read-it-later server that can generate RSS feeds, subscribe to those, and now everything is RSS and behaves the same. Wallabag is a great option for that and is self-hostable.
This is exactly what I do and it works great.
http://wallabag.it/ can publish your read-it-laters to RSS
It’s even simpler than that: In the first instance a human learned a thing. In the second instance a bunch of humans wrote software to ingest art and spit out some Frankenstein of it. Software which is specifically designed to replace artists, many of whom likely had art used as inputs to said software without their consent.
In both cases humans did things. The first is normal, the second is shitty.
Sorry, just to be clear, are you equating a human learning to an organization scraping creative works as inputs for their software?
The OSI doesn’t require open access to training data for AI models to be considered “open source”, unfortunately. https://opensource.org/ai/open-source-ai-definition
I agree that “open weights” is a more apt description, though
uh sure. My point is that sharing weights is analogous to sharing a compiled binary, not source code.
The definition of “open source” AI sucks. It could just mean that the generated model weights are shared under an open source license. If you don’t have the code used to train the model under an open source license, or you can’t fully reproduce the model using the code they share and open source datasets, then calling a model “open source” feels weird as hell to me.
At the same time, I don’t know of a single modern model that only used training data that was taken with informed consent from the creators of that data.
https://mobilizon.org/