the_post_of_tom_joad [any, any]

Sooner or later they’d get me for one thing if not for another…

[But if] a fellow ain’t got a soul of his own, just little piece of a big soul, the one big soul that belongs to everybody, then…Then it don’t matter. I’ll be all around in the dark – I’ll be everywhere.

  • 0 Posts
  • 28 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: September 5th, 2023

help-circle

  • the_post_of_tom_joad [any, any]@hexbear.nettoScience Memes@mander.xyzWe Got You
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    I know from first hand experience you can’t do it by accident as one time, hung over and showering in the dark in the early morning i got a little dizzy and sat down.

    Perfectly meeting my starfish to the shampoo bottle on the floor. It could not have been more on target had i attempted this.

    I shot up, seeing stars like for real for only the second time in my life. I wasnt dizzy, I was up and at em’ baby. Wooo what a rush! Hurt a lot for a minute. Hard as i sat down I don’t think that bottle tip made it a millimeter into my pooper.

    So yeah, impossible







  • IANAL but i am wondering if Disney is somehow letting this case go as a backdoor way to legitimize arbitration agreements.

    Like, i just can’t see Disney not knowing this is the wrong case to push the legitimacy of an arbitration agreement. But if this case somehow legitimized through whachacallit… precedent… that an arbitration agreement, while binding in a primary sense, is not binding for every Disney product, wouldn’t Disney (and really every company that uses binding arbitration as part of using their product) consider that a win?

    Because as i understand it, arbitration agreements as a requirement to use a service is still an untested legal grey area. Anything legitimizing them at all would be a win… Right? Againn ianal