silent_water [she/her]

  • 0 Posts
  • 41 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: October 26th, 2021

help-circle
  • yeah, I was lucky to have already taken Classical Mechanics prior to Quantum Mechanics (it wasn’t a prereq so most of my classmates jumped straight into QM), so the math was all perfectly sensible. but the second any prof started trying to use English to interpret the math, I started having these moments where I’d have to sit back and think about the words coming out of their mouths, and sitting with how it was all actually gibberish. Feynman’s “shut up and calculate” started to feel incredibly valid really fast, whereas prior to QM, I was under the impression that physics was natural philosophy. it’s not and QM was the breaking point, at least for me, personally.


  • they don’t actually spin but they’re little bar magnets as if they do. if you charge a sphere and spin it, you’ll generate exactly the same kind of bar magnet, but they don’t actually spin. and just like bar magnets, like repels like. but they’re neither bar magnets nor spinning. why don’t they spin? because they’re point masses, which don’t have any extent. but actually, you can’t really observe them as point masses because they’re waves.

    ^^ this was the exact point at which I said quantum mechanics wasn’t for me and I’m done with physics, after completing most of a degree. it sort of all makes sense but at the same time it completely doesn’t. it all makes sense as pure math but the second you try to make sense of the math, sense goes out the window.


  • silent_water [she/her]@hexbear.nettoScience Memes@mander.xyztopology
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    there are exactly 4 division algebras (over the field of real numbers): the real numbers, the complex numbers, the quaternions, and the octonians. you can’t add any more complex parts because you lost associativity with the octonians. I’m not entirely sure how the first domino leads to the last, though.








  • what’s the remainder of pi after division by 3 and 3^2? notice how the remainder is the same – i.e. there’s no 3s digit needed. and the same will be true for all higher powers of 3. this is because pi is <3^n for all n > 1. but we failed to express the fractional part of pi. if we extend to the p-adic rationals, we can express it as an infinite expansion but that’s not allowed for p-adics – they can only have a finite number of digits in the part to the right of the radix.


  • yeah, the remainder of pi after p^2 for p>2 will always be the same as the remainder after division by p (p^2 if p=2), so it truncates to the left of the radix, and p-adic rationals can’t go off infinitely to the right of the radix. also, more trivially, pi isn’t algebraic so it’s not the solution to any polynomial with rational coefficients, so it’s also not the solution to any polynomial mod p^n.