If physics taught you that 1 = pi, you may want to retake some classes.
If physics taught you that 1 = pi, you may want to retake some classes.
Works even better in Ruby, as the code as given is valid, you just need to monkey patch length
:
#!/usr/bin/env ruby
module DayLength
def length
if ["Sunday", "Monday", "Tuesday", "Wednesday", "Thursday", "Friday", "Saturday"].include? self
"24 hours"
else
super
end
end
end
class String
prepend DayLength
end
day = "Monday"
x = day.length
print(x)
It could be Ruby; puts
is more common, but there is a print
. With some silly context, the answer could even be correct:
#!/usr/bin/env ruby
module DayLength
def length
if ["Sunday", "Monday", "Tuesday", "Wednesday", "Thursday", "Friday", "Saturday"].include? self
"24 hours"
else
super
end
end
end
class String
prepend DayLength
end
day = "Monday"
x = day.length
print(x)
I’m just going off of Wikipedia, idk.
I’m sorry to hear that. I think at one point in my past, about half my job was tracking down nil dereference errors in Ruby. And probably a quarter was writing tests for things a good type system would catch at compile time.
A mincemeat pie is another name for a mince pie. So yeah.
I’m waiting for Outlook (Taylor’s Version).
Unfortunately, the answer to that doesn’t lie in science but in politics.
deleted by creator
I’m pretty sure that leads to multi-track drifting, and so all the people die.
Source: https://i.kym-cdn.com/entries/icons/facebook/000/000/727/DenshaDeD_ch01p16-17.jpg
It definitely is. A passkey in a TPM, for example, cannot leave a device. Also, passkeys can have phishing resistance that you cannot obtain with a password and most MFA solutions.
Where passkeys fall short is registering new devices and recovery. I’m not sure what 1Password’s solution is here.
The yellow blocks didn’t fit the desired story, so were disregarded as outliers.
0 should be the most comfortable, with less being cold and more being hot.
There’s also one at the end of act 2, if you have Gale with you.
I think modern inverter units are not less efficient when oversized. They are able to run at varying levels rather than cycling.
Are you sure about that? My understanding is that gravitational waves are predicted by general relativity, not inconsistent with it.
In any case, “all models are wrong, but some are useful”. Gravity as curvature is a pretty damn useful model.
Curvature of spacetime :)
They’re semantically different for PATCH requests. The first does nothing, the second should unset the
name
field.