you’re gonna get a LOT of opinions here. Try some out and find what you like the best. Personally, I run Dokuwiki, mostly because i can just zip the whole directory, and move it to another server or back it up a LOT easier than something like MediaWiki.

i thought there was gonna be some LGBTQI stuff here when i read “pride” versioning.

They increased prison labour to 2$/hr now??

get back in the kitchen and plop out some babbys! /s

if you have access to the file system, sed works well for renaming files and updating the links. Though admittedly, that’s not a very convenient way to to do it.

edit: and fucks up the page edit history a little too.

I use DokuWiki, and i love that it’s plaintext files. it makes backing them up so much easier. I can literally just zip the directory, then upload to somewhere else.

I am the only user on it, and i don’t use too many advanced features, so I don’t know how it stacks up against other more advanced wikis, such as mediawiki or wiki.js. Though I do use a lot of plugins, such as the infobox plugin. I love that plugin. It doesn’t rival MediWiki’s infobox, but it does the job well enough for me.

Note: I only have about 300 pages, so i have no idea how it stacks up against thousands or millions of pages, like MediaWiki.

if you break their TOS, you’ll likely lose your data. So… be careful. Mind you, I haven’t read their TOS, so i don’t know if those work arounds are breaking their TOS.

I always make a point to thank the driver, because i imagine it’s a pretty thankless job. I don’t see many other people thanking the driver, tbh. But i don’t catch the bus much as I don’t go anywhere.

yeah, but that’s why they privatise public services. Worked out so well for australia, to this date /s cough telstra cough

Land of the Free! Land of opportunities!*

*Ts&Cs apply.

X/Twitter, otherwise known as shitter.