New villain is a cleaner with a feather duster +1.
New villain is a cleaner with a feather duster +1.
It’s like this for large parts of human life; you just hope that no lawyer ever gets wind of whatever thing is being done.
Trying to sell 'owt without becoming a sell-out.
If >1 special character is not allowed the last check should be failed . The second check is literally satisfied even if there are 2+ specials.
I’d not be using that bank.
But if they do get jumbled, sorting them back out into different experiments, batches or subjects or time periods might make you prefer some extra info accesible by eye.
If you’ve got a robot sorter maybe a qr code - but you’d have to be pretty large scale for that to be cheaper than a human.
Magnum dong for scale.
There’s also a possibility that if humans live coyotes closely for several generations, it is likely to end up domesticated - one way or another.
Oh hang on, millions of humans already do live closely with domesticated canids.
There’s also a spoon to symbolise that the couriers were fed soup.
someone fix that goddamn islochnessmonster() function
yeah, I’ve been rohypnolled by both microsoft and oracle, and general cloud shit , and various co workwers so many times now i barely even notice.
Hilariosly excel has recently started asking now, I think it says something like: “I’ve just fucked up several columns in your csv that you went to the bother of enquoting.” “Do you want me to reload it and i’ll try to un-fuck a few of those columns? ( whispers to audience - but probably not all of them - tee hee).”
I think my employer just needs to employ 25-50 more “delivery” managers and empower them to spend millions on a prettier barrel for us to bend over, that’ll solve it. Maybe it’ll have flufffy handcuffs.
Even if they did use unicode, any codeset , glyph or language changes over time , ulimately they emerge out of communication, not the other way round.
If some culture decides they want to use the glyph “2” to mean a word “to”, they can and will, and no codeset is going to stop them. And if they get their message to their intended audience it doesnt matter that somebody else’s isnumber fuction get’s it wrong.
A person, community or standard codeset or dictionary cannot deny the accuracy or content of encrypted communication just because they can’t decipher it.
Put another way a more robust isnumber() should maybe have a second argument to specify the codeset being used, and maybe whether written words - in some defined languare - are also to be converted
On the other hand “1/4/12” is not a fucking date.
Are you asking for treefiddy upvotes?
The best antivirus program to run on a windows system is “fdisk” .
/jk
does that make it a disintegrated IDE?
This could be used like boss-key in old games.
l often get sent a long list of info/ criteria in excel. It’s often easiest (and traceable / maintainable back to their request) just to stay in the excel to generate large chunks of the SQL
Yeah wasn’t there an “isolated incident” in “the whole of France”? No real effect there. /s
Ah, so the corpse acceptability depends on the coefficient of corpse-permeability of the intermediate space as well as the distance.
Lead lined coffins are safer than wooden ones. This might also explain the thick metal doors you always see in morgues on tv.
I was thinking they might learn or get enchanted with a minor wind cantrip that they can cast on themselves infinite times, and rearrange themselves into words.
They can communicate with any literate character, but slowly, only in words that are short enough. Otherwise they have fo finish the word on their next turn.
If it’s genuinely windy in game, the player has to write their communication with their off hand, blindfold whilst someome shakes them or the paper randomly.