Marginal at best when everything is made elsewhere and requires fossil fuels for transport.

I think the alternative: copyright should be looser. It usually only benefits corporations and lawyers.

Though it would be naive to consider AI companies and ally in a goal to reduce copyright terms.

If it wasn’t for StarOffice/OpenOffice/LibreOffice Impress, is have thought a rename to Impress would be a good name.

I read this a few weeks ago about it.

https://www.wheresyoured.at/the-men-who-killed-google/

Always been a fan of it being Hal Finney, regardless of any evidence. It’s poetic symmetry with losing both around the same time.

Local companies may have similar names to others that exist overseas.

To require them to be in a globally common non-regionalised pool of domain names is more likely to increase scam risks.

Should the various regional companies of the Vodafone brand be forced to have all their world wide customers sign in to a global parent organisation Vodafone.com? Is it not better for the regionally specific customer portal be vodafone.com.au and vodafone.co.uk?

How does the use of ccTLDs furthers harms against the countries?

Ten years ago sure, the days I’d suggest matrix instead.

It’s an abundant resource curse; land is the resource that is wasted.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Resource_curse

Is that a picture of a straw man?

g

but honey bees should be raised in land they are native to.

Europe?