Wow, you came to the Jellyfin community to write a long comment saying “I don’t know what this is and I don’t care”?
You don’t have to care!
Wow, you came to the Jellyfin community to write a long comment saying “I don’t know what this is and I don’t care”?
You don’t have to care!
That’s an awfully kind response to someone who decided hate was on the menu today…
The world needs more people like you :)
Outer solar system becomes inner solar system. The king is dead all hail the new king!
5700 in my server works just fine too, no difficulty setting it up. Running in Docker. Even does HDR tone mapping!
Not so much well defined as fancy words. There is no example of a paying software development job that has no economic impact if the software were to fail.
If I ran a small shopify page for goat feed, I’d be an engineer for making sure the site stayed working so farmers could order their feed. It could even put lives at risk!
It really only excludes someone privately working on a video game for fun.
So given that, what are they actually regulating? What are they providing to their members to help them become better “software engineers”. I say it’s nothing at all? +
You missed my point that if professional engineering societies in Canada want to take ownership of software and electronics, they better do something and not just say they’re regulating it and sit on it with no clear definition for what it even is.
If they were doing their job, we wouldn’t need to debate what a software engineer is. They’ve let us down and they’re getting away with it.
But architects aren’t engineers either! We have engineers in building construction, they are called engineers.
They ensure all required calculations are done, all safety standards are adhered to, they complete detailed designs, and they sign off on a project legally so things like quotes and timelines have legal teeth.
I disagree, I believe the regulatory agencies do nothing in Canada to legitimize their claim to regulating software development. Heck, they do nothing for electronics or semiconductors or anything smaller than the power grid.
Wow this is unreal
What is your mother’s maiden name and/or first pet?
My point here is burning paper on a mass scale instead of using wires or an IC is not a solution, not even a little bit like biodegradable food containers.
Its solving a problem that isn’t really a problem!
I’m not sure how much of this is the actual project, or the author of the article, as there are all kinds of odd claims in there.
So it’s proposing we burn traces on single-use paper to solve climate change.
RFID tags as a security device are important and they can last as long as keys.
As a business card we can just stop doing it. Solved!
Not being a youtuber I don’t know, but do sponsors even know that you’re using sponsorblock? How could they tell?
Usually this is what they say before cancelling it 10 months later
My last city was always quick to point out that the (poor) bus service was not profitable and didn’t warrant any new investment.
But, the entire road system isn’t profitable. Especially the cul-de-sac in front of your house. But we all agreed it was “worth it” for our taxes to fund thatq because of the obvious benefits of getting goods and people around the city.
Transit should be no different. A service we pay for through our taxes. Not a profit seeking business.