- 9 Posts
- 98 Comments
2·4 months agoI don’t have an answer for you but I have one instead. When I attempted to do swarm my biggest challenge was shared storage. I was attempting to run a swarm with shared storage on a NAS. Literally could not run apps, ran into a ton of problems running stacks (NAS share tried SMB and NFS). How did you get around this problem?
Well she stopped using it so I deleted the instance (just too busy with small children). For the time that she was using it Bookstack seemed to have me her needs once a cohesive breakdown was established (translating Bookstack hierarchy and matching it up with her topics).
Something else to check is your infill percentage. Make sure you don’t have it at 100% (unless you absolutely need to build something completely solid). Another thing to check is your print speed. Too low and it will take a decade to print something simple. Too fast and it cause your print to fail. At this point we will all be throwing spaghetti against the wall. Can you share a screenshot of your settings?
Following. Sounds interesting.
Lemme fix the headline for you.
HashiCorp joins the list of companies and software killed by IBM.
Not quiet. I was running gitea before so my mount was ./gitea:/data but since switching over to forgejo, I renamed my ./gitea directory to ./forgejo. Adjusted my compose file to have a mount of ./forgejo:/data.
Now inside of that renamed forgejo directory, there are a bunch of gitea references and even one more directory called gitea. When I migrated everything worked right away but since I wanted a cleaner transition, I renamed and switched all gitea references to forgejo but went I brought the stack back online, it went belly up.
As a troubleshooting step, I recreated my compose file and created a new empty ./forgejo on a different machine just to see what a new and fresh install would look like and the forgejo stack itself created all kinds of gitea references and gitea directory once I brought it up. So to fix my original deployment, I reverted all the references back from forgejo to gitea and everything worked again.
For fun, I went out to codeberg to look at the Dockerfile and saw that they had a bunch of gitea things within their own Dockerfile so nothing I can do for now
This looks interesting too
Love that username tho!! Yeah might just do RSS. I already run FreshRSS and it’s ability to filter stuff would probably come in handy too
This sounds like the simplest and most effective solution. Thanks!
Interesting… do you like this way more or the rss route more?
Was not aware of Diun, will check out!
After you mentioned it, I looked it up too and stumbled on a similar answer to that link. Thanks!
Simple solution. I like it! Although I think it will get lost in the sea of daily emails….
Okay so your post inspired me to make the switch. All I had to do was switch out the image to the forgejo one. Everything worked right away. To try to make things as clean as possible, I went ahead and renamed my bind volume paths and app.ini stuff from gitea to forgejo but no matter what I tried, once I started the container, the container would create a gitea directory with a new app.ini. I even tried to run the forgejo compose on another host and the app still creates a gitea directory within the bind mount. Am I doing something wrong. I understand it’s a drop in replacement but I’m sure there’s a way to get a cleaner cut over.
compose.yml
volumes:
- ./data:/data
Host directories
~/forgejo
- data - forgejo - renamed for the migration - git - ssh - gitea - gets created by the app no matter what I do or what paths are set in app.ini
- compose.yml
How do I keep forgejo from creating this gitea directory? Why doesn’t it create a forgejo directory???
Edit: gitea version was - 1.21.7 and forgejo replacement image is 1.21.7-0
Actually, I’m curious as to why you mention Europe specifically?
I’m in the US but it does look like a very good candidate. Thanks!
This does look super nice but I need to have it centralized. We use multiple devices to do various things and will need to access this from all machines. So close!!!
Well sh.t… now I got a weekend project hahah
Copy/paste from another comment
“Just to be clear I just need to track my sales/revenue (even if input is manual) and track expenses (bonus if I could upload a picture of a receipt).
I don’t need to actually send an invoice (I do this straight from my website and it’s a seamless integration so not looking to reinvent this wheel, yet!)
Given the above, is in InvoiceNinja still a good candidate?”
I was under the impression that Google retired the “app password” workflow and moved to Gmail API within Google Cloud. I have the API set up and that’s what I’m using in the Vikunja configs but like I mentioned in the post, at this point I don’t care if its Gmail or something else. I just need the email functionality to work so I will use whatever service works well with Vikunja.