Pitbull lovers can suck my dick. You’re all cretins who deserve to get your faces chewed off.
How many people need to fucking die for you to feel satisfied, you’re worse than mutts.
Most of the Amazon exploiters are not even from Brazil. So of course since the land now belongs to external agents the country’s laws don’t do jack shit.
No you didn’t. You probably didn’t bother checking before running your mouth and now that you’ve been caught being an asshole you’re doing the republican trademark “can’t you take a joke?”
Fair enough! Thanks for the detailed write-up
What about PostgreSQL?
Exactly! So many people assume the science of economics is unfounded because of what some purported “economists” say online or because of some already-irrelevant methodologies the science has abandoned for years already…
The most egregious problem being assuming that the methodology isn’t sound and scientific, and that it instead depends on the whims of the researcher (here they would place researcher in quotation marks, I imagine).
I have had to do game theory, statistics, econometrics, data science (thanks to my chosen specialisation), a lot of math especially about optimisations and linear algebra… And the quality of the academic research is empirical. Rarely will you even find a paper that only uses qualitative data in economics, except maybe in the behavioural economics field. Most often we use natural experiments to replicate RCTs within a macro environment, or double-blind experiments to investigate an economic agent’s systemic preferences and responses within a micro environment…
People who complain about the superficiality of the “soft sciences” have never stepped foot in a class beyond the very basics of that subject taught in highschool. They therefore project their current knowledge on the entire field, marring it…
I hate this :'|
Funny you should say that, because those very humanities aspects of what I studied, Economics, lead STEM students to disparage it as a non-scientific field built of gospel and tenets. As if Humanities diminished the quality of the research and teaching within the Economics field.
So while I agree, and it’s good to see you being upvoted, in a different scenario the application of your thoughts about this will lead the person sharing their experience to get massively downvoted in an attempt to shame them for studying a “soft science”.
I will do as I please. But in any case, I have no reason to go after someone unless I notice a pattern of downvotes on my comments and content anyway, in which case I am already the victim of a smear campaign of sorts.
Thanks!
How do you see who liked or disliked your posts/comments?
Unless you’re Brazilian.
Right alongside gender fluid.
Would love to know, my friend purchased one and it’s still within the return window.
Saying FOSS solves enshittification and disregarding the fact that this completely ignores the entire hardware enshittification side of things is dumb as all hell.
And I will not stand for dumb bullshit.
The laptops you mentioned are not FOSS because they’re neither free nor software. So my point stands about the shit the top comment in this thread is spewing about FOSS as the enshittification solution.
Removed by mod
FOSS is just software… it’s literally what’s that acronym means.
Edit: imagine downvoting the truth because it slapped you in the face. Hope you all get a fucking welt from that reality check.
That’s cool buddy, next time someone talks about Tech in general (the post you clearly didn’t read from OP), you can spew your strawman bullshit about how FOSS solves enshittification. And be wrong as all fuck.
Well just point me towards a FOSS laptop then. Or a FOSS TV? Why not a FOSS toothbrush?
Tech is not just software 🙄.
Whoops, did not realise. My bad. Most news about Brazil and deforestation default to the Amazon, so that’s where my head went.