![](/static/66c60d9f/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://programming.dev/pictrs/image/170721ad-9010-470f-a4a4-ead95f51f13b.png)
I would smash everything into a handful of overly-complicated lines.
I would smash everything into a handful of overly-complicated lines.
No, just the impression I got from what you said. Emphasis on the socialism, not on the computer program.
If we want to address all of those, then we’ll need higher pollution taxes too. Going after only one abstract category of greed will encourage them to bullshit it into another category.
IMHO what makes it more appealing now than 20 years ago is the bonkers inequality. We could do a really bad job at socialism and still be better off than we are today. We’re just flushing trillions of dollars worth of value down the toilet on pointless nonsense that only like 100 people want.
“Ummm then we’re not an AI company”
Land Value Taxes are better for this in literally every way.
Call me an optimist but I think the closest thing to socialism we’ll ever see is socialism, not a cool new app.
Moral of the story: never make breaking changes. Always backwards compatible, always.
[spider destroys scientist’s house]
He’s a kung fu master
Smart move. I recently upgraded from 14.4 to 33.6 and regret it.
Still gonna be done before ES6
Check out Beyond Skyrim
Hopefully it’ll be like Minecraft; that game has gotten way better since Microsoft.
Even a bot trained on Redditors would be better than either major candidate.
Enshittification vs open source progress.
When you fight Musk on his platform, you fight Musk by his terms. Allowing some criticism creates the illusion of legitimacy.
Perhaps a Lemmy server, in which only moderator-approved users can vote on posts?
I love engineering because there’s objective right and wrong. Either the machine will work or it won’t; you can’t bullshit physical reality.