I really hope it’s going to be closer to the original than Below Zero.
I liked Below Zero but it wasn’t able to instill the same feeling of dread and anxiety that Subnautica could. Below Zero felt a lot more “child-friendly”.
And for the love of god: Get that Sea Truck out of my sights. I want my Cyclops back!
Tbf, it really started to go downhill, when they got bought up.
I am generally in favor of a subscription model as opposed to the whole loot box crap, cause you know beforehand what you get and what it costs. Yes, it creates some FOMO, but this was partly balanced out by the passive skill training system.
Its just too expel sive to be fun.
I have a reoccurring “nightmare” in which I try to get back into EVE, log in, notice I logged out in a high value ship in the middle of null sec and struggle with the overview. Had a lot of fun playing for a couple of years, though.
Thank you!
I can’t find it right now, but there is some explanation in “Clean Code” why switches shouldn’t be used all over the place.
Interestingly I found multiple physical copies of Concord at my local mall.
Cool! Do you know what’s the sort of stone/mineral in the front? It looks so different from the surrounding material.
As is tradition with MS and their complicated naming policies Visual Studio is not VS Code.
Nah, slap a ‘Data lake’ label on it and call it a day
In case you are serious: Lemmy.ml is known for being a tankie instance. So a nonsensical anti-west statement makes a lot more sense considering the instance the user chose.
Yay, let’s all hate on the one crypto messenger, that is independently verifiably secure.
If Telegram wasn’t good for privacy, Western governments would not be trying to shut it down.
They are not trying shutdown Telegram, they are trying to control it.
E2EE is nice, but doesn’t matter if the government can just sieze or hack your phone. Much better to use non-Western social media and messaging apps.
What kind of argument is this supposed to be? Governments can size your phone anywhere … oh wait … lemmy.ml … yeah, I see…
It IS the point. If Telegram was designed and set up as a pure carrier of encrypted information, no one could/should fault them for how the service is used.
However, this is not the case, and they are able to monitor and control the content that is shared. This means they have a moral and legal responsibility to make sure the service is used in accordance with the law.
I am going to quote myself here:
The issue I see with Telegram is that they retain a certain control over the content on their platform, as they have blocked channels in the past. That’s unlike for example Signal, which only acts as a carrier for the encrypted data.
If they have control over what people are able to share via their platform, the relevant laws should apply, imho.
Well, except Telegram isn’t a good tool for privacy.
There is no E2EE. Simple encryption is only available for 1:1 chats and disabled by default. Telegram doesn’t disclose their encryption methods, so there is no way to verify the (in)effectiveness. Telegram is able to block channels from their end, so there is no privacy from their end either.
Now hold my beer for a second, English is just my second language, but “built” is past tense for “build”, isn’t it?
Turn off /all chat and watch 95% of the toxic flame disappear.
For what? Destabilizing the whole technological ecosystem of the planet is not a crime. ¯\(ツ)/¯
Avocados originate from Mesoamerica where Winters are mild. They have no dormant period.
That’s alright as long as I can use the Cyclops instead.