don’t eat lead it is bad for you

Uh, no. Can’t you read? These are not people. They are Russian cybercriminals

My first instinct was A, at the base of the neck. But now that I think about it I think I agree with this more. I think it could be argued that at the joint is where the neck really begins, and that the narrow part beneath that is still part of the body. And I think it would look better (and more professional!) if our weevil friend wore his tie there.

These tricks have never worked for me, I wonder if that has some implication. I can see working clocks in dreams, both the digital and analog kinds. Reflections look normal. Hell, I’ve looked directly at myself (or a doppelganger?) in dreams before.

So don’t even bother locking your front door then?

Pretty much because cops might walk in if there’s nothing physically stopping them but they’d have to do a bunch of paperwork if they smash my window to get in. In a world without cops I probably wouldn’t lock my doors.

Let’s not make it easy for the rando who doesn’t know much of anything.

When and why is “the rando who doesn’t know much of anything” accessing your home PC?

Home computer? I wouldn’t even have a password. If someone has physical access to your PC there are ways for them to get what they want no matter how strong your password is. You just need it to be secure enough to prevent specific people you know have access from getting in. Family, friends, whatever. So basically the only risk is that you use a password that they know you use because you shared an account with them or something.

Removed by mod

reddit bros would literally rather believe they slipped through the cracks in reality than that they misremembered one word for its synonym

You know I’ve never quite bought the hermit crab shells = houses analogy. They seem much more analogous to armor.

give it a few hundred million years and ours won’t be able to do a total solar eclipse either :(

I was gonna complain about the same thing, whole image is ruined

spooky green line stay away

I pointed out what I considered (and still consider) to be the most likely use for the tech you were describing, while asking you if that was your intention. A simple “no, actually I was thinking more about another use case” would have been a far more neutral and reasonable response. Instead, you assumed I was speaking in bad faith and responded in kind. You are the only one making assumptions or starting fights for no reason.

I just criticized your behavior assuming things, before you know the whole truth.

I didn’t assume anything. I asked you what your intended use case was and you responded with vague platitudes, sarcasm, and then once I pressed further, insults. Try re-reading your comments from a more objective standpoint and you’ll find neutrality nowhere within them.

Ever thought about identifying ships full of refugees and send help, before their ships break apart and 50 people drown?

No, I didn’t think about that. If you did, why exactly were you so hostile to me asking what use you thought this might serve?

no u

My intended use case is to find possibilities how ML can support people with certain tasks.

weaselly bullshit. how exactly do you intend for people to use technology that identifies ships via satellite? what is your goal? because the only use cases I can see for this are negative

This is no reason to stop science entirely

if the only thing your tech can be used for is bad then you’re bad for innovating that tech

5 years ago I created a model that was able to spot certain types of ships based only on satellite imagery, which were not easily detectable by eye and ignoring the fact that one human cannot scan 15k images in one hour.

what is your intended use case? are you trying to help government agencies perfect spying? sounds very cringe ngl

Checks out. I’m a man and I would definitely administer at least one shock to myself. Probably upwards of ten.