He’s like a bee, telling the rest of the hive where the joy is at.
He’s like a bee, telling the rest of the hive where the joy is at.
Beep beep coming though!
There’s a HACS integration called ‘variable’ that might help. Create the variable, then just:
If it helps, it’s supposed to be a drop-in replacement.
The solution to racism is not to let them breed together? 😕
So, all of the awkward pauses, the lack of inflection - you’re saying keep those, just change who it sounds like is speaking?
I use digital ocean as dns host. They have an API, so I check my IP with a script and update if needed.
Classic sewage turbine.
Took a long time and a lotta effort.
Your options are “grow” or “repeat”. Unfortunately, you’re the one most equipped to take responsibility for your own life, but you evolved into this situation, and evolution is messy. It’s not your fault, bit it’s your responsibility.
Accepting those things deeply enough, and what they mean personally, changes everything.
I’m glad there’s someone else out there with the same concerns.
I’d be more glad if unknowns and inconsistencies were frankly acknowledged. Even though in some senses Feynman contributed to the metaphorical tech debt, one of the things I love about his lectures is his frankness in regard to the (then) current state of knowledge, and about how much was simply unknown. Much of that is still unknown, and there are major glaring inconsistencies that are handwaved into oblivion.
To be clear, this is not an “anti-science” comment, but rather a desire to see the institution of science become more consistent, and to address unknowns honestly.
Where would the big bang come from?
The state cannot have been absolutely static - if it was, the big bang would not have occurred, and the same stasis would be existing now, unchanged.
Time is change, and exists whether or not we measure it.
Sick burns
licks the edible paper, but it tastes like plant
meows
This. The institution of science is deeply biased towards the established knowledge base - partly due to monetary interests, partly due to ‘simple’ social inertia, like when someone doesn’t want some kid to come up with ideas that may invalidate things they have seen to (seem to) work.
Like with magnetohydrodynamics - it’s useful for modeling some things, but depends on the notion that space (as in, the interplanetary and interstellar medium) is either nonconductive or infinitely conductive - which simply isn’t the case.
Plasma cosmologists have made some really nutty assertions. However, ideas should be treated on their merit - and some of what they theorize has a lot of solidity. But in general, it’s treated with derision, because (admittedly) it also traffics in unicorns.
If someone who purports to traffic in unicorns also traffics in the Principia Mathematica, it doesn’t invalidate the latter.
Truth