Also, we’d have to hear them pronounce it to know if it was an acronym or an initialism, if my understanding is correct.

I recognized the name, but couldn’t place it until I heard the voice.

I’m assuming he’s male, but no females are collecting his packets.

Probably Alexander, if there’s a gram of accuracy there.

He would consider that a compliment, no doubt.

It’ll feel like playing undocked, I would imagine.

100,000 people. With 100, they’ll just take as many as they can. With 100k, they just have to let the sea wash over them and hope they aren’t swept out with it.

I believe we determined that Jesus invented Buddha and Buddha invented VPNs. So, by extension we could say without Jesus, there would be no VPNs. Also, no corn chips.

Is that what you’re into or is that your special skill in life, guessing what someone’s gas smells like based on the food they eat?

In my field they do publish results without success, but it must either be (a) something seminal in the field or (b) interesting in a notable way. General things aren’t going to have the juice to get through the review process. One exception to this is the shotgun method. If you’re testing a bunch of different things that get at the same question and they all miss, you might still get published, but that’s because it’s adjacent to (b).

Good movie. Watched it twice. Considering a third.

True, but it does suggest they are in the same league. Not saying it is, but able to be compared suggests that it may be as good in some aspects.