![](https://lemmy.sdf.org/pictrs/image/ba84ab8f-8650-4951-a6f5-35ea2badb754.png)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/8643f5f8-893b-470d-8037-601a0e704ea3.png)
Sod’s law someone finally posts this on the day I decide to make a post. I promise I did check the board yesterday when there wasn’t an update! Thanks for the explanation though.
English but not in a Brexit way.
Sod’s law someone finally posts this on the day I decide to make a post. I promise I did check the board yesterday when there wasn’t an update! Thanks for the explanation though.
I’m learning Rust at the moment and I too think I have some reservations with its syntax. Most of these reservations come from my strong preference for functional programming over OOP.
I am unsure if I like method-syntax period, even if it isn’t inherently OO. Chaining just makes me feel uncomfortable in a way piping doesn’t.
Also it seems idiomatic for values of enumerated types to be written Type::Enum
, which seems ugly and unnecessary.
What’d you make of this article?: https://matklad.github.io/2023/01/26/rusts-ugly-syntax.html
{-# LANGUAGE OverloadedStrings #-}
import qualified Data.Text as T (Text)
correctAnswer :: T.Text
correctAnswer = "Haskell"
Doom Emacs with lsp
and rust-analyzer
They’ve got at least two: an NA one and an EU one.